ASRock Arc A580 Challenger 8GB GDDR6
The Arc A580’s 8GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus and hardware AV1 encoding set it apart for budget-conscious creators, while its factory 2000 MHz overclock targets smooth 1440p gaming. The dual-fan cooler with 0dB Silent mode and a metal backplate delivers a quiet, durable build rarely found at this price point. This card is best for budget-minded gamers and streamers who need modern features like XeSS upscaling and AV1 encoding without paying for 4K capability.
Panoramica
The 30-Second Version
The ASRock Arc A580 Challenger is a budget 1080p card with 8GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus, AV1 encoding, and DisplayPort 2.0. It scores 12,028 on PassMark and lands at the 86th percentile for affordability. The 175W TDP is high for this performance tier, and driver quirks still exist. At CAD 300 it's a steal, but at CAD 699 you should look at used RTX 3070s instead.
Pros & Cons
Pro
- 8GB GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus gives better memory bandwidth than typical budget cards 87th
- DisplayPort 2.0 and HDMI 2.1 outputs are rare at this price point 86th
- AV1 encoding support is excellent for streamers and content creators 83rd
- Dual-fan cooler stays quiet and keeps temps in check under load 72nd
- Strong affordability score at the 86th percentile in our database
Contro
- 175W TDP is high for this performance tier, hurting efficiency
- Rasterization performance lands at only the 27th percentile
- Driver compatibility issues still pop up in some games and apps
- Ray tracing performance is weak even with XeSS support
- Requires two 8-pin power connectors and a 650W PSU
Cosa dicono i proprietari
The Word on the Street
Come è cambiata l'opinione dei proprietari nel tempo
EsclusivaIn base a quando i clienti hanno effettivamente scritto le recensioni, per vedere se gli elogi iniziali sono durati.
Basato su 8 recensioni dei clienti datate, raggruppate per trimestre solare. L'analisi per periodo è in inglese.
Le prove
Performance
The PassMark G3D score of 12,028 puts this card in a weird spot. It's not going to blow anyone away, but it's not embarrassing either. For 1080p gaming, our scoring gives it a 44.1 out of 100, which sounds rough until you remember this is a budget card. The 8GB of VRAM on a 256-bit bus is actually a smart move by Intel. That wider bus means better memory bandwidth than you'd get from a 128-bit card with the same VRAM, which helps at higher resolutions and with texture-heavy games.
The 175W TDP is the elephant in the room. That's a lot of power draw for this performance tier. Our efficiency score lands at the 26th percentile, which means this card runs hot and hungry compared to what it delivers. The dual-fan Challenger cooler handles it fine, with owners reporting it stays cool under full load and the fans stay quiet even at full blast. But your power bill will notice. The 650W PSU recommendation is real, and you'll need two 8-pin connectors, which is unusual for a card in this class. Ray tracing performance sits at the 31st percentile, so it's there if you want it, but don't expect to crank RT settings in demanding titles. XeSS helps a lot here, and one owner mentioned being satisfied at 4K with XeSS enabled, which is impressive for a budget card.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Chipset
| GPU Chipset | Arc A580 |
| Brand | Intel |
| Architecture | Xe-HPG (Alchemist) |
| Class | consumer |
Memory
| VRAM | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bus | 256 |
Compute
| Base Clock | 2000 |
| Boost Clock | 2000 |
Performance
| PassMark G3D | 12028 |
| GPU Compute | 4886 |
Power & Cooling
| TDP | 175 |
| Recommended PSU | 650 |
| Power Connectors | 2 x 8-Pin |
| Cooler | Dual Fan |
| Fans | 2 |
Connectivity
| Interface | PCI Express 4.0 x16 |
| DisplayPort | 3 |
| HDMI | 1 |
| Max Displays | 4 |
| Max Resolution | 7680 x 4320 |
Physical
| Length | 271 |
| Slot Width | 2.4 |
| Form Factor | ATX |
| Weight | 0.8 kg / 1.7 lbs |
Features
| Ray Tracing | Yes |
| Upscaling | XeSS |
| AV1 Encode | Yes |
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate |
| RGB | No |
vs Competition
The competitive landscape is brutal right now. The MSI Gaming Trio RTX 5070 and ASUS Prime RTX 5070 are in a completely different league, both in performance and price. Those cards are for 1440p and 4K gaming, while the A580 is a 1080p card. If you're cross-shopping these, you're either confused or have a very specific use case. The XFX Mercury RX 9070 XT and Gigabyte Gaming RX 9070 XT are similarly out of reach, with 16GB of VRAM and dramatically better rasterization performance.
The real competition for the A580 comes from cards like the RX 6600, RTX 3050, and used RTX 3060. Against those, the A580's 256-bit memory bus and AV1 encoding give it a legitimate edge for content creators. The RX 6600 is more efficient and has better driver maturity, but it lacks AV1 encode and DisplayPort 2.0. The RTX 3050 has DLSS and better ray tracing, but it's often more expensive and has less VRAM. The A580's XeSS upscaling has improved significantly, and Intel's driver updates have fixed many of the early Alchemist issues. But if you're not willing to tinker, AMD and NVIDIA are still safer bets.
| Spec | ASRock Arc A580 Challenger | MSI GAMING TRIO G5070-12GTC | PNY OC VCG5070T16TFXPB1-O | ASUS PRIME PRIME-RTX5070-12G | Sapphire NITRO+ 11348-01-20G | XFX Mercury RX-97TRGBBB9 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Arc A580 | GeForce RTX 5070 | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | GeForce RTX 5070 | Radeon RX 9070 XT | Radeon RX 9070 XT |
| Vram | 8GB GDDR6 | 12GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 12GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR6 | 16GB GDDR6 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | 2000 | 2610 | 2450 | 2512 | 3060 | 3100 |
| Tdp W | 175 | 250 | 300 | 250 | 304 | 304 |
| Memory Bus Bits | 256 | 192 | 256 | 192 | 256 | 256 |
| Ray Tracing | true | true | true | true | true | true |
| GPU Class | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Prodotto | AI | Rt | Vram | Raster | Feature | Thermal | Efficiency | Connectivity | Riscontro degli utenti | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASRock Arc A580 Challenger | 25.7 | 31.1 | 41.2 | 26.2 | 72.1 | 55.9 | 25.7 | 87.1 | 82.6 | 85.9 |
| MSI GAMING TRIO G5070-12GTC Compare | 62.1 | 82.6 | 65.4 | 79.8 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 79.3 | 94.1 | 95.5 | 30.3 |
| PNY OC VCG5070T16TFXPB1-O Compare | 79.2 | 92.2 | 85.6 | 88.8 | 66.2 | 91.5 | 72.9 | 81.9 | 95.5 | 25.8 |
| ASUS PRIME PRIME-RTX5070-12G Compare | 62.1 | 82.6 | 65.4 | 79.8 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 79.3 | 94.1 | 95.5 | 45 |
| Sapphire NITRO+ 11348-01-20G Compare | 89.5 | 84.6 | 74 | 75.8 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 46.1 | 88.8 | 88.8 | 36.3 |
| XFX Mercury RX-97TRGBBB9 Compare | 89.2 | 84.6 | 75.7 | 75.8 | 96.2 | 72.4 | 46.1 | 94.1 | 95.5 | 40.9 |
Prezzo
Value & Pricing
Here's where things get interesting. The CAD pricing spread is wild, ranging from CAD 300 to CAD 699 across two listings. That's a CAD 399 gap for the same card, which tells you some retailers are still pricing this like it's launch day while others have adjusted to reality. If you're in Canada, shop around. The lower end of that range makes this a compelling budget pick. The higher end puts it dangerously close to cards that will absolutely embarrass it in raw performance.
At the CAD 300 mark, you're getting a card with modern features, decent 1080p performance, and AV1 encoding that budget cards from the previous generation simply don't have. At CAD 699, you're in used RTX 3070 or RX 6700 XT territory, and those cards will run circles around the A580 in most games. The GBP 439 listing is similarly awkward. That's not a great price for this card when you consider what else is available. The value story here depends entirely on finding it at the right price.
Amazon 1 offerta Da 389 CA$
Price History
Approfondisci
Overview
The ASRock Arc A580 Challenger is Intel's swing at the budget GPU market, and honestly, it's a swing that connects more often than it misses. This is an 8GB GDDR6 card on a 256-bit bus, running Intel's Xe-HPG Alchemist architecture with a 2000MHz boost clock. It's aimed squarely at 1080p gamers who want ray tracing and AV1 encoding without selling a kidney. The dual-fan Challenger cooler keeps things compact at 271mm, and you get modern outputs with three DisplayPort 2.0 ports and one HDMI 2.1.
Who's this for? Someone building a budget AM5 or AM4 rig who needs a stopgap card, or a first-time builder who wants modern features like XeSS upscaling and AV1 encode for streaming. The 4.5-star rating across 135 reviews tells you most buyers are happy, but the 1-star reviews reveal a card that still has rough edges. Intel's driver team has been grinding away since the Alchemist launch, and the A580 benefits from that maturity, but it's not perfect.
What makes this interesting is the value proposition. In our database, this card sits at the 86th percentile for affordability and 87th for connectivity. That's a rare combo. You're getting DisplayPort 2.0, which most cards at this price skip entirely, and the 256-bit memory bus is wider than what you'd typically find on budget cards. The catch is that raw performance lands at the 27th percentile for rasterization. So you're trading raw speed for features and future-proofing.
Common Questions
Q: Is the Arc A580 good for 1080p gaming?
Yes, for most modern titles at 1080p, the A580 delivers playable frame rates, especially with XeSS enabled. Our gaming score of 44.1 out of 100 reflects its budget positioning, but the 8GB of VRAM on a 256-bit bus helps it handle texture-heavy games better than cards with narrower memory buses. Just make sure to enable ReBAR in your BIOS, as Intel's architecture relies on it heavily.
Q: Does the Arc A580 support AV1 encoding?
Yes, the A580 has hardware AV1 encoding, which is a standout feature at this price point. This makes it an excellent choice for streamers and content creators who want efficient, high-quality video encoding without spending more on a higher-tier card. Most budget cards from the previous generation lack AV1 encode entirely.
Q: What power supply do I need for the Arc A580?
ASRock recommends a 650W power supply, and the card requires two 8-pin PCIe power connectors. The 175W TDP is on the higher side for this performance tier, so make sure your PSU has enough headroom, especially if you're running a power-hungry CPU alongside it.
Q: Are Intel Arc drivers still problematic?
Intel's driver situation has improved significantly since the Alchemist launch, but some issues remain. Most modern games run fine, but older titles, VR applications, and some productivity software can still have compatibility problems. If you're willing to keep drivers updated and occasionally troubleshoot, the experience is much better than it was at launch.
Who Should Skip This
If you're into VR gaming, skip this card entirely. Multiple owners report that VR headset link simply doesn't work, and Intel's driver team hasn't prioritized VR compatibility. You'd be better off with an RTX 3060 or RX 6600, both of which handle VR without the headaches. Similarly, if you play a lot of older games from the DX9 or DX11 era, you'll likely run into performance issues that newer titles don't have, since Intel's drivers are optimized for modern APIs like DX12 and Vulkan.
If you're not comfortable tinkering with BIOS settings like ReBAR or troubleshooting driver issues, this isn't your card. The A580 rewards patience and technical know-how, but punishes those who expect everything to just work. For a truly plug-and-play budget experience, look at the RX 6600 or a used RTX 3060 instead. And if you're planning to game at 1440p or higher, this card will struggle in demanding titles, so save up for something with more raw horsepower.
Verdict
If you're building a budget 1080p gaming rig and you're comfortable with occasional driver quirks, the A580 is a solid pick at the right price. The AV1 encoder alone makes it worth considering for streamers on a budget, and the DisplayPort 2.0 support gives you some future-proofing for high-refresh monitors. The 8GB of VRAM on a 256-bit bus means it handles texture-heavy games better than you'd expect from a card in this class.
But if you want a plug-and-play experience with zero tinkering, look elsewhere. The 1-star reviews aren't wrong. Some games and apps still have issues with Intel's drivers, and VR compatibility is a known weak spot. If you're into VR or you play a lot of older games that haven't been optimized for Arc, you'll be frustrated. For everyone else, especially those who don't mind enabling ReBAR and keeping drivers updated, this card punches above its weight when you find it at the right price.
Usage Scores
- Complessivo46.6
- AI/LLM25.5
- Budget80.6
- Gaming 4k28.8
- Ray Tracing42.1
- Workstation39.7
- Gaming 1080p44.3
- Gaming 1440p41.3
- Content Creation41.7