Kingston ValueRAM
Le module DDR5 de 32 Go fonctionne à 6400 MT/s avec une latence CL52, offrant des performances conformes aux normes JEDEC pour un usage quotidien. Il est testé à 100 % et soutenu par plus de 30 ans de fiabilité Kingston et une assistance technique gratuite, ce qui en fait un choix fiable pour les assembleurs. Idéal pour les utilisateurs de stations de travail soucieux de leur budget qui ont besoin d'une barrette unique de grande capacité sans fonctions d'overclocking.
Aucun prix actuel chez les marchands
Aperçu
The 30-Second Version
6400 MT/s puts this Kingston stick in the 95th percentile for speed, but CL52 latency drags it down to the 26th percentile. At 620 USD for a single 32GB module, it's priced like a premium kit while delivering budget-tier timings. Fast, but not a smart buy for most people.
Pros & Cons
Points forts
- 6400 MT/s speed lands in the 95th percentile, best-in-class bandwidth 95th
- Runs at just 1.1V, efficient for a high-speed module 71st
- 32GB capacity on a single stick leaves room for future upgrades
- JEDEC-tested and backed by Kingston's warranty and support
Points faibles
- CL52 latency sits in the 26th percentile, loose timings for DDR5
- Affordability score of 19th percentile, priced like premium RAM without premium specs
- Feature set is bare, 18th percentile, no heat spreader or extras
- Server suitability is weak at 25.3/100, not a flexible module
Les preuves
Performance
6400 MT/s is the number that matters here. That's top-of-the-charts territory for DDR5 UDIMMs in our database, and it means this stick will keep up with far more expensive kits in raw bandwidth. The single-rank, 288-pin design is straightforward and compatible with most modern desktop boards. Running at 1.1V is also notable, it's efficient for a module at this speed.
But CL52 is where the shine wears off. That's a 26th percentile latency score, which translates to noticeably slower response times than the CL32 and CL30 kits that dominate the top of our charts. For gaming, where latency often matters more than raw bandwidth, this stick falls behind. For workstation tasks that love bandwidth, like video editing or large file transfers, the speed advantage helps offset the loose timings. It's a trade-off, and you'll feel it depending on what you're doing.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Memory
| Type | DDR5 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | 32768 |
| Modules | 1 |
| Per Module | 32768 |
| Pins | 288 |
| Rank | Single-rank |
Performance
| Speed | 6400 |
| CAS Latency | 52 |
| Timings | 52-52-52 |
| Voltage | 1.1 |
Class
| ECC | No |
| Registered | No |
Features
| RGB | No |
| Heat Spreader | No |
vs Competition
Stacked against the competition, the Kingston ValueRam has a clear identity crisis. The Corsair VENGEANCE RGB CMH64GX5M2Y6400C32 runs the same 6400 MT/s but with CL32 timings, dramatically better latency, and it's a 64GB kit. The G.Skill Ripjaws S5 F5-6400J3239G32GX2-RS5K also hits 6400 MT/s at CL32, again with tighter timings. The Crucial Pro Overclocking CP2K16G64C32U5B and KLEVV CRAS V RGB both offer lower latency and more features. The ADATA Lancer Blade RGB AX5U6000C3016G-DTLABRBK runs slower at 6000 MT/s but with CL30 timings, which often translates to better real-world gaming performance. The Kingston's only real edge is single-stick 32GB capacity, but that's a narrow win when the latency gap is this wide.
| Spec | Kingston ValueRAM | Corsair VENGEANCE RGB CMH64GX5M2Y6400C32 | G.Skill Ripjaws S5 F5-6400J3239G32GX2-RS5K | Crucial Pro Overclocking CP2K16G64C32U5B | KLEVV CRAS V RGB KD5KGUD80-60A300G-BLACK | ADATA Lancer Blade RGB AX5U6000C3016G-DTLABRBK |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 32GB | 64GB | 64GB | 32GB | 64GB | 32GB |
| Kit | 1 x 32GB | 2 x 32GB | 2 x 32GB | 2 x 16GB | 2 x 32GB | 2 x 16GB |
| Memory Type | DDR5 | DDR5 | DDR5 | DDR5 | DDR5 | DDR5 |
| Speed Mts | 6400 | 6400 | 6400 | 6400 | 6000 | 6000 |
| Cas Latency | CL52 | CL32 | CL32 | CL32 | CL30 | CL30 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM | UDIMM | UDIMM | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Ecc | false | false | false | false | false | false |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produit | Speed | Feature | Latency | Capacity | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kingston ValueRAM | 94.8 | 18.1 | 25.6 | 70.7 | 19.2 |
| Corsair VENGEANCE RGB CMH64GX5M2Y6400C32 Compare | 94.8 | 89.6 | 87.6 | 89.8 | 6.7 |
| G.Skill Ripjaws S5 F5-6400J3239G32GX2-RS5K Compare | 94.8 | 74.8 | 87.6 | 89.8 | 5.2 |
| Crucial Pro Overclocking CP2K16G64C32U5B Compare | 94.8 | 74.8 | 87.6 | 70.7 | 27.3 |
| KLEVV CRAS V RGB KD5KGUD80-60A300G-BLACK Compare | 87.6 | 89.6 | 87.6 | 89.8 | 9.3 |
| ADATA Lancer Blade RGB AX5U6000C3016G-DTLABRBK Compare | 87.6 | 89.6 | 87.6 | 70.7 | 15.5 |
Prix
Value & Pricing
Here's where things get uncomfortable. The affordability score is 19th percentile, which means this stick is priced near the bottom of the value barrel in our database. We're seeing it listed at 620 USD in the US, 679 CAD in Canada, 679 EUR in Germany, and 565 GBP in the UK. For a single 32GB stick with CL52 timings and zero extras, that's a tough sell. You're paying a premium for the 6400 MT/s speed while accepting budget-tier latency. The price per performance ratio just doesn't add up when faster, lower-latency kits are available in the same ballpark.
Price History
En savoir plus
Overview
The Kingston ValueRam KVR64A52BS8-32 hits 6400 MT/s, which puts it in the 95th percentile for speed in our database. That's the headline here. A single 32GB stick of DDR5 running at that frequency is genuinely fast, and it does it at a modest 1.1V. But the latency story is less flattering. CL52 timings land it in the 26th percentile, which means this is a high-speed module with the kind of latency you'd expect from budget DDR5. The speed is real, but it comes with a catch.
Kingston positions this as a no-frills, JEDEC-spec workhorse for system builders and OEMs. No RGB, no heat spreader drama, no overclocking headroom to speak of. It's tested to industry standards and backed by Kingston's warranty, which is fine. But at the prices we're seeing, the value proposition gets murky fast. More on that below.
Common Questions
Q: Is CL52 latency bad for gaming?
Yes, it's a weak spot. CL52 lands in the 26th percentile for latency in our database, which means most DDR5 kits respond faster. Games tend to care more about latency than raw bandwidth, so this stick will likely underperform compared to CL30 or CL32 kits at similar or lower speeds.
Q: Can I overclock this memory?
Not really. This is a JEDEC-spec ValueRam module designed for system builders who want plug-and-play reliability. The feature score is 18th percentile, meaning there's no XMP profile headroom or enthusiast-oriented tuning. You're getting the rated 6400 MT/s at CL52 and that's about it.
Q: Is a single 32GB stick better than two 16GB sticks?
It depends on your upgrade path. A single 32GB stick leaves a slot open for adding another 32GB later, which is nice. But you lose dual-channel memory bandwidth until you add a second stick. For most users, two 16GB sticks in dual-channel will outperform a single 32GB stick in real-world tasks.
Who Should Skip This
Gamers should look elsewhere. The 26th percentile latency score means this stick will hold back frame times compared to CL30 or CL32 kits that cost less. Anyone building a server should also steer clear, the server suitability score of 25.3/100 is one of the weakest we've seen for this category. And if you're shopping on a budget, the 19th percentile affordability score tells you everything you need to know. This is not the value play Kingston's ValueRam name suggests.
Verdict
The Kingston ValueRam KVR64A52BS8-32 is a fast module with a serious latency problem and a price tag that doesn't match its spec sheet. The 6400 MT/s speed is genuinely impressive, but CL52 timings hold it back in real-world use, especially for gaming. At 620 USD for a single stick, you're paying premium money for a module that loses to cheaper, lower-latency alternatives in most workloads. If you specifically need a single 32GB stick at high speed and don't care about latency, it works. For everyone else, there are better options.
Usage Scores
- Global58.8
- Budget61.6
- Jeux60.2
- Laptop42.7
- Server25.3
- Workstation63.2