新品

Gigastone Game Turbo 256GB SATA III 2.5"

★★★★★ 4.6 (375)
Capacity 256GB
Form Factor 2.5"
Interface SATA III
Read Speed 540 MB/s
NAND TLC
Gigastone Game Turbo 256GB SATA III 2.5" ssd
35 综合评分

暂无零售商最新价格

其他可用国家/地区:

概览

优缺点

优点

  • Strong social proof (77th percentile) 77th

缺点

  • Below average capacity (18th percentile)
  • Below average speed (18th percentile)
  • Below average random (23rd percentile)

用户评价

用户口碑如何随时间变化

独家

依据客户实际撰写评价的时间--让你看到最初的好评是否持续。

用户口碑随时间保持稳定
76/100我们的 AI 口碑分析置信度中 · 21 个来源 · 2026年11月
1★2★3★4★5★Q3 '20: 5.0★ · 1 条评价Q4 '20: 5.0★ · 1 条评价Q1 '22: 5.0★ · 1 条评价Q2 '22: 5.0★ · 1 条评价Q3 '22: 5.0★ · 1 条评价Q4 '22: 5.0★ · 1 条评价Q2 '24: 5.0★ · 2 条评价Q3 '24: 1.0★ · 1 条评价Q4 '24: 5.0★ · 1 条评价Q1 '25: 3.7★ · 3 条评价Q2 '25: 5.0★ · 1 条评价Q3 '25: 3.4★ · 5 条评价Q1 '26: 5.0★ · 2 条评价1111112113152Q3 '20Q4 '20Q1 '22Q2 '22Q3 '22Q4 '22Q2 '24Q3 '24Q4 '24Q1 '25Q2 '25Q3 '25Q1 '26
平均评分满意(4-5★)不满意(1-2★)柱形高度 = 评价数量
  1. Q3 202560/1003.4★5 条评价

    Buyers report mixed experiences: some praise speed and value, while others cite severe slowness, read/write failures, and one drive failing within weeks.

    • One drive failed after 15-20 days; another reports very slow performance and read/write errors.
    • Several buyers find drives fast, reliable, and suitable for restoring old PCs or as multi-pack value.
    • Performance varies: one user reports good speed, another says very slow even under light use.
  2. Q1 202567/1003.7★3 条评价

    Buyers report strong performance in Proxmox and Xbox use, but one reviewer found SATA drives faster, noting slower read/write times.

    • Great performance in Proxmox VM and ZFS RAID, boosting VM performance.
    • Works well in Xbox, reducing load times significantly after two weeks.
    • Slower read/write times compared to SATA drives, surprising for SSD.

基于 21 条带日期的客户评价,按日历季度分组。分期分析为英文。

实测数据

性能表现

性能百分位

Speed 18.1
Random 22.7
Feature 53.5
Capacity 17.8
User Sentiment 37.4
Endurance 57.3
用户口碑 77.4
Affordability 58.2

规格参数

完整规格参数

Drive

Capacity 256
Form Factor 2.5"
Interface SATA III
Protocol SATA
External No

Performance

Sequential Read (MB/s) 540

Hardware

NAND TLC
DRAM Cache No

Reliability

Warranty (years) 5

Features

Heatsink No
Hardware Encryption No

竞品对比

Spec Gigastone Game Turbo Samsung 990 PRO Crucial T710 Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRDK/2000G Lexar Professional NM1090 PRO Team Group MP44 TM8FPW004T0C101
Capacity 256GB 2TB 4TB 2TB 2TB 4TB
Form Factor 2.5" M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280
Interface SATA III PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 5.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 5.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4
Seq Read 540 MB/s 7,450 MB/s 14,500 MB/s 7,300 MB/s 14,000 MB/s 7,400 MB/s
Nand Type TLC TLC TLC TLC TLC SLC
Dram Cache false true false true true false
Endurance - 1200 TBW 2400 TBW 2000 TBW 1400 TBW 2000 TBW
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
产品 SpeedRandomFeatureCapacityUser SentimentEndurance用户口碑Affordability
Gigastone Game Turbo 18.122.753.517.837.457.377.458.2
Samsung 990 PRO Compare 93.797.498.978.579.78695.323.1
Crucial T710 Compare 99.199.185.792.508677.410.9
Kingston Fury Renegade SFYRDK/2000G Compare 93.294.393.978.567.994.295.316.4
Lexar Professional NM1090 PRO Compare 98.198.597.478.5091.25224.2
Team Group MP44 TM8FPW004T0C101 Compare 93.588.678.592.507787.115.9

价格

性价比分析

我们自 2026年11月8日 起追踪该产品的价格。数据增多后将显示图表。

使用场景评分

总体 (35.3)Budget (65.1)游戏 (22.5)Laptop (33.9)Console (11.1)Portable (8.4)Workstation (31.8)
  • 总体35.3
  • Budget65.1
  • 游戏22.5
  • Laptop33.9
  • Console11.1
  • Portable8.4
  • Workstation31.8

完整评测即将发布。上方的规格、评分、价格和图表始终保持最新。

其他配置4

类似产品