Western Digital WD Blue SA510 4TB SATA III 2.5"
The 4TB WD Blue SA510 delivers sequential reads up to 560 MB/s and writes up to 520 MB/s, backed by TLC NAND and a DRAM cache for consistent performance. Its 400 TBW endurance and 5-year warranty make it a reliable upgrade, while the included Acronis True Image software simplifies cloning your existing drive. Best for budget-conscious desktop users seeking a high-capacity SATA SSD for everyday tasks and light creative work.
Aperçu
The 30-Second Version
The WD Blue SA510 4TB has a user sentiment score of 12/100, the worst in our database. Multiple verified buyers report drive failures within weeks or months. The 4TB capacity and 560 MB/s sequential reads are nice, but they don't matter if the drive dies on you.
Pros & Cons
Points forts
- 4TB capacity at the 93rd percentile for SATA drives 93rd
- 560 MB/s sequential read hits the SATA III ceiling 89th
- DRAM cache keeps basic performance consistent 68th
- 5-year warranty and 400 TBW endurance rating
- Acronis True Image software included for migration
Points faibles
- User sentiment score of 12/100, dead last in our database
- Random IOPS at the 39th percentile, mediocre for modern workloads
- Multiple verified reports of drive failure within months
- Warranty process described as frustrating by owners
- Write speeds called out as sub-par by multiple buyers
L'avis des propriétaires
The Word on the Street
L'évolution de l'avis des propriétaires dans le temps
ExclusivitéD'après la date à laquelle les clients ont rédigé leurs avis - pour voir si l'enthousiasme initial s'est confirmé.
D'après 9 avis clients datés, regroupés par trimestre civil. L'analyse par période est en anglais.
Les preuves
Performance
Sequential reads hit 560 MB/s and writes hit 520 MB/s. That's the SATA III ceiling, so no surprises there. Random performance is where things get less exciting. 87K random read IOPS and 83K random write IOPS land at the 39th percentile, which is mediocre for a modern SSD. The TLC NAND and DRAM cache help with consistency, but this is not a drive you buy for snappy random workloads.
For basic use, like booting an older system or storing a media library, the sequential speeds are fine. But the moment you start hammering it with small file operations, it falls behind most drives in our database. And that's before we even get to the reliability reports.
Specifications
Full Specifications
Drive
| Capacity | 4000 |
| Form Factor | 2.5" |
| Interface | SATA III |
| Protocol | SATA |
| External | No |
Performance
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | 560 |
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | 520 |
| Random Read (IOPS) | 90000 |
| Random Write (IOPS) | 82000 |
Hardware
| NAND | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | Yes |
Reliability
| Endurance (TBW) | 400 |
| MTBF (hours) | 1750000 |
| Warranty (years) | 5 |
Features
| Heatsink | No |
vs Competition
Stacked against the Samsung 990 Pro, Micron T710, Seagate FireCuda 530R, Kingston Fury Renegade, and SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100, the SA510 is not playing the same game. Those are all PCIe Gen 4 drives with sequential speeds in the thousands of MB/s. The SA510's 560 MB/s read is roughly a fifth of what those drives deliver. The one place it wins is capacity per dollar at the low end of its price range, but even that advantage evaporates when you factor in the reliability reports. The Kingston Fury Renegade 4TB and Seagate FireCuda 530R both offer 4TB capacities with dramatically better endurance and speed, and their user sentiment doesn't live in the basement.
| Spec | Western Digital WD Blue SA510 | Samsung 9100 PRO | Kingston FURY Renegade SFYRDK/4000G | SanDisk WD_BLACK SN8100 | Crucial T710 | Lexar NM1090 PRO LNM109P004T-RNNNU |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4TB | 4TB | 4TB | 8TB | 4TB | 4TB |
| Form Factor | 2.5" | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | SATA III | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 5.0 x4 |
| Seq Read | 560 MB/s | 14,800 MB/s | 7,300 MB/s | 14,900 MB/s | 14,500 MB/s | 14,000 MB/s |
| Nand Type | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | TLC | SLC |
| Dram Cache | true | true | true | true | false | true |
| Endurance | 400 TBW | 2400 TBW | 4000 TBW | 4800 TBW | 2400 TBW | 2800 TBW |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produit | Speed | Random | Feature | Capacity | User Sentiment | Endurance | Preuve sociale | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Western Digital WD Blue SA510 | 36.6 | 42.4 | 89.3 | 92.5 | 0.3 | 67.9 | 56.2 | 11.7 |
| Samsung 9100 PRO Compare | 99.2 | 99.8 | 99.7 | 92.5 | 0 | 85.9 | 99.6 | 5.3 |
| Kingston FURY Renegade SFYRDK/4000G Compare | 93.3 | 94.3 | 93.9 | 92.5 | 0 | 94.1 | 95.3 | 9.2 |
| SanDisk WD_BLACK SN8100 Compare | 99.1 | 99.3 | 97.5 | 98.1 | 94.9 | 80.7 | 45 | 3.1 |
| Crucial T710 Compare | 99.1 | 99.1 | 85.6 | 92.5 | 0 | 85.9 | 77.5 | 10.7 |
| Lexar NM1090 PRO LNM109P004T-RNNNU Compare | 98.1 | 98.5 | 97.5 | 92.5 | 0 | 74.9 | 57 | 8.5 |
Prix
Value & Pricing
Pricing is all over the place. In the US, this drive ranges from USD 750 to USD 1,130 across four listings. That's a USD 380 spread for the exact same drive. In Canada, it runs CAD 840 to CAD 1,195, a CAD 355 gap. If you're dead set on buying this, shop around hard. The cheapest US listing is the only one that even approaches reasonable for a 4TB SATA drive, and even then, you're paying a premium for capacity while getting bottom-tier reliability feedback. For context, you can find PCIe Gen 4 drives with dramatically better speed and endurance for less money in many cases.
Amazon 1 offre À partir de 880 $CA
Memory Express 1 offre À partir de 840 $CA
Nous suivons les prix de ce produit depuis le 8 nov. 2026. Le graphique apparaîtra dès que nous aurons plus de données.
En savoir plus
Overview
The WD Blue SA510 4TB is a SATA III drive that tops out at 560 MB/s read and 520 MB/s write. That puts it in the 35th percentile for speed in our database, which is about what you'd expect from SATA in a world gone PCIe-crazy. The capacity story is better. 4TB in a 2.5-inch form factor lands at the 93rd percentile, so if you need a big dumb bucket of storage for an older laptop or desktop, this thing technically fits the bill.
But here's the problem. Our user sentiment data puts this drive at the 0th percentile. Zero. Multiple verified buyers report failures within weeks or months. The 400 TBW endurance rating and 5-year warranty look fine on paper, but the real-world reliability chatter is brutal. When the specs say one thing and the owners say another, we listen to the owners.
Common Questions
Q: What kind of real-world speeds should I expect from this drive?
Sequential reads top out at 560 MB/s and writes at 520 MB/s, which is the SATA III ceiling. Random performance is less impressive at 87K read IOPS and 83K write IOPS, putting it at the 39th percentile in our database. For basic file transfers and booting an older system, it's fine. For heavy random workloads, it's mediocre.
Q: Is the WD Blue SA510 reliable?
The specs say 400 TBW endurance and a 5-year warranty, but our user sentiment data tells a different story. The drive scores 12/100 on sentiment, the worst in our database. Multiple verified buyers report failures within months, and the warranty process gets called out as frustrating. We'd look elsewhere if reliability matters to you.
Q: Does this drive come with cloning software?
Yes, WD includes Acronis True Image for Western Digital for data migration and backup. It's one of the few things owners actually praise about this drive. You may need a separate cable for the transfer, which is sold separately.
Who Should Skip This
Skip this drive if you value your data or your time. The user sentiment score of 12/100 is the worst in our database, with multiple verified buyers reporting failures within months. The random IOPS at the 39th percentile are mediocre, and the write speeds get called out as sub-par. If you need 4TB of storage, look at the Kingston Fury Renegade 4TB or Seagate FireCuda 530R instead. They cost more per gigabyte at the high end, but they won't leave you fighting a warranty claim six months in.
Verdict
We can't recommend this drive. The 4TB capacity is genuinely useful, and the sequential speeds are fine for SATA, but the user sentiment score of 12/100 is the worst we've seen in this category. Multiple verified buyers report failures within months, and the warranty process gets called out as frustrating. When a drive's owners are telling you it bricks their computers, the specs stop mattering. Spend your money on a drive that doesn't have a documented pattern of early death.
Usage Scores
- Global62.2
- Budget67.6
- Jeux56
- Laptop62.5
- Console27.9
- Portable17.6
- Workstation66.9