Nouveau
MSI RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP OC
The dual-fan VENTUS design with TORX 2.0 blades delivers 175W TDP cooling and a reinforced backplate for durable builds. Its 14.36 FP16 TFLOPS and PassMark 16473 score make it a solid 1080p performer, though AI workloads lag at 7.1/100. Best for budget gamers upgrading from older GPUs who prioritize reliable cooling and neutral aesthetics over raw 1440p or AI capability.
TDP 175 W
19 Score global
Aucun prix actuel chez les marchands
Aperçu
Avantages et inconvénients
Points forts
Points faibles
- Below average vram (1st percentile)
- Below average connectivity (5th percentile)
- Below average ai (6th percentile)
- Below average thermal (7th percentile)
Les preuves
Performances
Caractéristiques techniques
Fiche technique complète
Compute
| FP16 TFLOPS | 14.36 |
| FP32 TFLOPS | 7.181 |
Performance
| PassMark G3D | 16473 |
Power & Cooling
| TDP | 175 |
Physical
| Weight | 0.7 kg / 1.6 lbs |
Face à la concurrence
| Spec | MSI RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP OC | ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING | Gigabyte AERO GV-N5080AERO OC-16GD | ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P | Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G | PNY ARGB OC VCG508016TFXXPB1-O |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | - | GeForce RTX 5090 | GeForce RTX 5080 | GeForce RTX 5080 | Radeon RX 7900 XTX | GeForce RTX 5080 |
| Vram | - | 32GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 16GB GDDR7 | 24GB GDDR6 | 16GB GDDR7 |
| Boost Clock Mhz | - | 2407 | 2730 | 2730 | 2680 | 2620 |
| Tdp W | 175 | 575 | 360 | 360 | 339 | 360 |
| Memory Bus Bits | - | 512 | 256 | 256 | 384 | 256 |
| Ray Tracing | - | true | true | true | true | true |
| GPU Class | - | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer | consumer |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produit | AI | Rt | Vram | Raster | Compute | Feature | Thermal | Efficiency | Connectivity | Affordability |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSI RTX 2060 SUPER VENTUS GP OC | 5.5 | 31.8 | 0.9 | 36.9 | 16.3 | 11.2 | 6.6 | 54.1 | 5.4 | 48.2 |
| ASUS TUF Gaming TUF-RTX5090-32G-GAMING Compare | 96.9 | 90.1 | 97.6 | 98.7 | 97.6 | 96.2 | 72.4 | 24.6 | 99.3 | 3.5 |
| Gigabyte AERO GV-N5080AERO OC-16GD Compare | 85.2 | 95.2 | 88.7 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 57.8 | 94 | 15.1 |
| ZOTAC APOCALYPSE ZT-B50800C-10P Compare | 85.2 | 97.5 | 88.7 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 57.8 | 94 | 19.1 |
| Sapphire NITRO+ 11322-01-40G Compare | 94.9 | 96.2 | 91.7 | 83.9 | 95.5 | 83.9 | 91.5 | 52.6 | 98.7 | 17.6 |
| PNY ARGB OC VCG508016TFXXPB1-O Compare | 85.2 | 97.5 | 88.7 | 94.2 | 93.2 | 96.2 | 91.5 | 57.8 | 94 | 18 |
Scores par usage
- Global18.9
- AI/LLM7.1
- Budget46.7
- Gaming 4k19.4
- Ray Tracing19.6
- Workstation11.4
- Gaming 1080p31.2
- Gaming 1440p26.1
- Content Creation10.1
Un test complet arrive bientôt. Les caractéristiques, scores, prix et graphiques ci-dessus sont toujours à jour.
