Nouveau

Intel BX806733104

Le processeur Intel Xeon Bronze 3104 offre 6 cœurs à 1,7 GHz avec une mémoire cache de 8,25 Mo, prenant en charge la DDR4 jusqu'à 2133 MHz et une TDP de 85 W. Sa technologie Speed Shift et Speed Step optimise la gestion de l'énergie, tandis que la virtualisation Intel est intégrée. Ce modèle convient aux serveurs d'entrée de gamme ou aux stations de travail légères, mais il est peu adapté aux charges IA ou gaming intensives.

Intel BX806733104 cpu
9 Score global
Aussi disponible dans:

Aperçu

The 30-Second Version

The Xeon Bronze 3104 is one of the slowest CPUs we've ever tested, landing in the bottom 3-4% for single-thread, multi-thread, and efficiency. It only makes sense if you need the absolute cheapest chip for an existing LGA3647 server board. For everyone else, skip it.

Pros & Cons

Points forts

  • Dirt cheap on the used market if you just need a basic server chip
  • LGA3647 socket means it works in older dual-socket boards
  • Low 85W TDP keeps power draw predictable
  • Supports ECC memory, which matters for server use

Points faibles

  • Single-thread performance is in the bottom 3% of all CPUs we've tested
  • No hyperthreading, so six threads is all you get
  • Efficiency is terrible, you burn watts for very little output
  • DDR4 capped at 2133MHz, which is slow even for its era

Les preuves

Performance

The numbers are rough. Single-thread performance lands in the bottom 3% of all CPUs we've tested, which means even basic tasks feel sluggish. Multi-thread isn't much better at the 4th percentile, and with no hyperthreading those six cores run out of steam fast. Efficiency is somehow worse, sitting at the 4th percentile, so you're getting very little work done per watt. The 85W TDP isn't crazy high, but the performance per watt is abysmal. AI workloads? Forget it. That score is a 4.2 out of 100, dead last in our charts.

Performance Percentiles

AI 3.1
Feature 20.5
Platform 17.4
Efficiency 3.4
Multi Thread 3.4
Affordability 47
Single Thread 2.9

vs Competition

Stacked against the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, this Xeon looks like it's from another planet. The Ryzen has eight cores, modern architecture, and gaming performance that's off the charts, while the 3104 sits in the bottom 3% for single-thread. The Core i9 BX80673I99960X is another LGA3647 chip but with way more cores and clock speed, so it's the obvious upgrade path if you're stuck on that socket. Even the old E5-2697 v2, a chip from 2013, has more threads and better multi-thread throughput. The only reason to pick the 3104 is if you find it for pocket change and just need something to boot a server.

Spec Intel BX806733104 AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF G.Skill Trident Z Neo Lenovo Ryzen 5 Sparepart:
Cores - 16 24 - 6 6
Threads - 32 48 - 12 12
Boost Clock Mhz - 5700 4000 - 4200 4000
L3 Cache Mb - 128 128 - 32 8
Tdp W - 120 200 - 65 15
Socket - AM5 AMD Socket SP3 - AMD Socket AM4 AM4
Integrated Graphics - AMD Radeon Graphics - - - AMD Integrated Graphics
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Produit AIFeaturePlatformEfficiencyMulti ThreadAffordabilitySingle Thread
Intel BX806733104 3.120.517.43.43.4472.9
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Compare 9698.692.49795.714.592.9
CG CHIPS GATE EPYC 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 1PC New 6GK7443-1EX30-0XE0 Communications Processor Compare 94.877.284.585.193.95.280.4
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Compare 85.720.517.466.5976.398.4
G.Skill Trident Z Neo Compare 72.387.47984.27220.372.4
Lenovo Ryzen 5 Sparepart: Compare 61.855.157.399.462.49.966.8

Prix

Value & Pricing

Pricing is all over the place. In Europe you'll see it listed anywhere from EUR 244 to EUR 388 depending on the vendor, and that spread is wild for a chip this old. The best deal in our data comes from the DE listings at the EUR 244 end. But honestly, even at the low end you're paying for a CPU that gets smoked by used desktop chips costing half as much. Unless you specifically need LGA3647 for an existing server board, this is hard to justify.

À partir de 422 $CA 1 offre chez 1 marchand
Amazon 1 offre À partir de 422 $CA

Price History

340 $CA 360 $CA 380 $CA 400 $CA 420 $CA 440 $CA 10 juin9 nov. 422 $CA

En savoir plus

Overview

The Intel Xeon Bronze 3104 is a server chip from a bygone era trying to hang on in 2025. Six cores, no hyperthreading, and a 1.7GHz base clock that feels glacial next to anything modern. It's built for cheap dual-socket servers, not your desktop, and it shows in every benchmark we ran.

Our database puts this thing in the bottom 5% for single-thread, multi-thread, and efficiency. That's not a typo. If you're looking at this for anything other than a very specific budget server build, you're probably in the wrong aisle.

Common Questions

Q: Can I use this CPU for gaming?

No. Its gaming score is 7.4 out of 100, and the 1.7GHz base clock with no turbo boost means even older games will struggle. This is a server chip, not a gaming chip.

Q: Does this support ECC memory?

Yes, the Xeon Bronze 3104 supports ECC DDR4, which is one of the few reasons to consider it for a budget server build. Memory speed is capped at 2133MHz though.

Q: Is this worth buying for a home server?

Only if you already have an LGA3647 motherboard and need the cheapest possible chip to get it running. Otherwise, a used desktop CPU or even an older Xeon E5 will give you far better performance per dollar.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this if you need any kind of responsive performance. If you're building a home server, a used Ryzen or even an old Xeon E5 v2 will run circles around it for less money. And if you're thinking about gaming, streaming, or any AI tinkering, this chip is a hard pass. The only buyer who should consider it is someone with an LGA3647 board already in hand and a budget so tight it squeaks.

Verdict

This is a niche chip for a niche buyer. If you have an LGA3647 board sitting around and need the cheapest possible CPU to get it running, the Bronze 3104 will do that. But for anything else, even light home server duty, there are better options for less money. It's slow, inefficient, and outclassed by hardware that's over a decade old.

Usage Scores

Global (8.6)AI/LLM (4.2)Budget (20.9)Jeux (7.4)Server (5.3)Efficiency (5.5)Productivity (6.8)
  • Global8.6
  • AI/LLM4.2
  • Budget20.9
  • Jeux7.4
  • Server5.3
  • Efficiency5.5
  • Productivity6.8

Autres configurations1

Produits similaires