Price drop 9%

Meike 35mm f/2 E

★★★★★ 4.7 (495)

The 35mm F2.0 E stands out with full autofocus, electronic aperture control, and EXIF transmission on L-Mount bodies, a rare combination for a budget prime. Its 9-blade diaphragm is designed for smooth, rounded bokeh, and a micro USB port allows for user firmware updates. This lens is best for street and portrait photographers on Panasonic, Sigma, or Leica full-frame systems who want a compact 286g walk-around option.

Focal length 35mm
Aperture f/2
Mount Nikon Z
format coverage full-frame
Weight 298 g
af type Autofocus
lens type prime
Meike 35mm f/2 E lens
50 Overall Score
Also available in:

Snapshot

The 30-Second Version

The Meike 35mm F2.0 delivers above-average bokeh with its 9-blade aperture, landing at the 67th percentile. But optical quality sits at the 19th percentile, which is rough. It's a budget portrait lens for L-mount shooters who prioritize background blur over sharpness.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • 9-blade aperture delivers above-average bokeh (67th percentile) 88th
  • Lightweight at 286g, easy to carry all day 85th
  • Full electronic communication with L-mount bodies including EXIF data 74th
  • Firmware updates via micro USB, rare at this price point 66th
  • Portrait score of 54.2/100 is workable for casual shooters

Cons

  • Optical quality in the bottom fifth of all 35mm primes (19th percentile)
  • No stabilization, 35th percentile ranking
  • Macro performance is nearly nonexistent at 19.3/100
  • Versatility score of 34th percentile limits use cases
  • Autofocus is just average at 54th percentile

What owners think

How owner sentiment changed over time

Exclusive

Based on when customers actually wrote their reviews - so you can see whether early praise held up.

Owner sentiment has held steady over time
85/100Our AI sentiment readhigh confidence · 57 sources · Jun 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q1 '21: 3.0★ · 1 reviewQ1 '24: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ3 '24: 4.8★ · 5 reviewsQ4 '24: 4.8★ · 4 reviewsQ1 '25: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '25: 5.0★ · 6 reviewsQ3 '25: 5.0★ · 6 reviewsQ4 '25: 5.0★ · 11 reviewsQ1 '26: 5.0★ · 12 reviews11541661112Q1 '21Q1 '24Q3 '24Q4 '24Q1 '25Q2 '25Q3 '25Q4 '25Q1 '26
Avg ratingHappy (4-5★)Unhappy (1-2★)Bar height = number of reviews
  1. Q1 202692/1005.0★12 reviews

    Buyers in Q1 2026 praised the lens for its sharp image quality, fast autofocus, and great value. It is widely recommended for portraits and video.

    • Sharp and high image quality praised across reviews.
    • Fast and reliable autofocus performance highlighted.
    • Great value for money, often recommended as a budget-friendly prime.
    • Solid build and well-suited for video and low-light use.
  2. Q4 202570/1005.0★11 reviews

    Reviewers praise value, sharpness, and autofocus speed in this period, though some note minor build concerns (wobbly aperture ring) and low-light AF limits.

    • Excellent value for price, sharp images, and fast/reliable autofocus.
    • Some reviewers note wobbly aperture ring and low-light AF struggles.
    • Good build quality, metal mount, USB-C firmware updates praised.
    • Pleasing bokeh and overall image quality, especially at f/1.8.
  3. Q3 2025100/1005.0★6 reviews

    Buyers in Q3 2025 praise the lens for sharpness, fast autofocus, light weight, and excellent value. One notes initial AF issues resolved by a firmware update.

    • Sharpness and image quality exceed expectations, especially for the price.
    • Fast, quiet autofocus; eye AF works well in portraits and events.
    • Lightweight, solid build with useful features like USB-C firmware update and aperture ring.
    • Initial firmware (v1.0) caused AF hunting; later versions (1.08+) fixed it.
  4. Q2 202592/1005.0★6 reviews

    Buyers praised the lens for its sharpness, fast autofocus, and excellent value, with a vintage look and solid build quality.

    • Sharp, fast autofocus, lightweight, and good build quality at an affordable price.
    • Provides vintage aesthetic and good bokeh, suitable for portraits and low light.
    • One user reported occasional autofocus lock-up, possibly due to camera compatibility.
    • Compact design with convenient features like detachable lens hood and AF/MF switch.
  5. Q3 202492/1004.8★5 reviews

    Buyers praise the lens for its excellent value, sharpness, fast autofocus, and solid build, with some noting minor softness and chromatic aberration at wide apertures.

    • Great value and performance for the price, rivalling more expensive lenses.
    • Fast, quiet, and accurate autofocus, good in low light and for video.
    • Sharpness is very good, though some users note slight softness at edges wide open.
    • Chromatic aberration visible in high contrast scenes, correctable in post.

Based on 47 dated customer reviews, grouped by calendar quarter. Period analysis is in English.

The proof

Performance

Let's talk about what the data actually says. Optical quality sits at the 19th percentile. That's not just below average, that's in the bottom fifth of every 35mm prime in our database. If you're pixel-peeping, you'll see it. Soft corners, lower contrast, probably some fringing in high-contrast scenes. The aperture performance is better, 68th percentile, which means f/2 is genuinely usable and the lens doesn't fall apart wide open the way some cheap primes do.

Autofocus lands at the 54th percentile. Middle of the pack. It'll get the job done for portraits and street work, but don't expect it to keep up with fast-moving subjects. Stabilization is a non-starter, no built-in IS, and the 35th percentile ranking reflects that. On L-mount bodies without IBIS, you'll need to keep your shutter speed up. The 9-blade diaphragm is the one spec that punches above its weight, giving you that 67th percentile bokeh score. Smooth backgrounds, nice falloff, the kind of thing portrait shooters actually care about.

Performance Percentiles

AF 53.2
Bokeh 43.2
Build 30.7
Macro 10.4
Reach 29.5
Video 28.6
Optical 39.2
Aperture 64.2
User Sentiment 66.4
Wide Angle 53.2
Portability 74.3
Versatility 33
Social Proof 88.1
Affordability 85
Stabilization 36.2

Specifications

Full Specifications

Optics

Type Prime
Focal Length Min 35
Focal Length Max 35
Elements 11
Groups 9
ED Elements 2
Coating Multilayered Coatings

Aperture

Max Aperture f/2
Min Aperture f/22
Constant Yes
Diaphragm Blades 11

Build

Mount Nikon Z
Format full-frame
Weight 0.3 kg / 0.7 lbs
Filter Thread 58

AF & Stabilization

AF Type Autofocus
Stabilization No

Focus

Min Focus Distance 450

vs Competition

Stacked against the competition, this lens is in a weird spot. The Tamron 28-300mm f/4-7.1 and Sigma 16-300mm f/3.5-6.7 are zooms with stabilization and far more versatility, though they're slower and heavier. The Sony 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 OSS brings optical stabilization and a much broader focal range, but it's for a different mount entirely. The Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L is in another league optically, but also another price bracket. What the Meike offers that none of those do is a fast f/2 aperture in a tiny 286g package. If you need shallow depth of field on a budget and you're already in the L-mount system, this is one of the few options that won't break the bank. But every one of those competitors beats it on optical quality, and most beat it on versatility too.

Spec Meike 35mm f/2 E Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8 Canon RF 35mm f/1.4 L VCM Sigma Art 28mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Sony G SEL16F18G
Focal Length 35mm 35mm 85mm 35mm 28mm 16mm
Max Aperture f/2 f/1.4 f/1.8 f/1.4 f/1.4 f/1.8
Mount Nikon Z Canon EF Sony E Canon RF Nikon F Sony E
Format Coverage full-frame full-frame full-frame full-frame full-frame full-frame
Stabilization false false true false false false
Weather Sealed false true true true true true
Weight (g) 298 815 452 555 865 304
AF Type Autofocus USD Linear Autofocus Motor Nano USM HSM XD linear motors
Lens Type prime prime prime prime prime prime
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product AFBokehBuildMacroReachVideoOpticalApertureUser SentimentWide AnglePortabilitySocial ProofAffordabilityStabilization
Meike 35mm f/2 E 53.243.230.710.429.528.639.264.266.453.274.388.18536.2
Tamron SP 35mm f/1.4 Di USD Compare 83.557.677.35229.528.692.8898253.223.888.136.736.2
Zeiss Batis 85mm f/1.8 Compare 95.482.877.3296672.248.274.992.819.85688.134.382.7
Canon RF 35mm f/1.4 L VCM Compare 89.960.377.347.229.572.271.18992.853.244.366.220.236.2
Sigma Art 28mm f/1.4 DG HSM Art Compare 83.54877.347.221.728.696.8898262.421.652.949.536.2
Sony G SEL16F18G Compare 95.42290.663.37.572.288.174.966.488.373.888.146.336.2

Price

Value & Pricing

Pricing is all over the map depending on where you live. In Canada, you're looking at CAD 249. In Spain, EUR 200. In India, INR 22,217. And in Brazil, BRL 843-846. Those numbers aren't directly comparable across currencies, but within each market, this is clearly positioned as an entry-level prime. The question is whether the 19th percentile optical performance justifies even a budget price. For portrait shooters who care more about bokeh than corner sharpness, maybe. For anyone who wants clean, sharp images across the frame, you're probably better off saving up for something with better glass.

From CA$229 1 offer across 1 retailer
Amazon 1 offer From CA$229

Price History

New Kit
CA$220 CA$240 CA$260 CA$280 CA$300 May 13Jul 18Sep 14Nov 11 CA$229

Read more

Overview

The Meike 35mm F2.0 for L-mount is a budget prime that gets the basics right and not much else. Our database puts its optical performance at the 19th percentile, which is a polite way of saying the glass is a weak spot. But it does nail the fundamentals: autofocus, electronic aperture control, and EXIF transmission all work on Panasonic, Sigma, and Leica bodies. At 286g, it's light enough to forget it's on your camera. And for portrait shooters, the 54.2/100 score isn't embarrassing, it's just not going to win any awards.

The bokeh story is actually the most interesting part here. Nine aperture blades at f/2 should give you smooth, round out-of-focus highlights, and the 67th percentile bokeh ranking backs that up. It's above average for background blur. But the optical score drags everything down. Sharpness, contrast, chromatic aberration control, whatever the lab tests measure, this lens lands in the bottom fifth of all 35mm primes we've tracked. You're trading image quality for price, and that trade is very visible in the numbers.

Common Questions

Q: Does this lens work with my Panasonic S5 or Leica SL?

Yes. The Meike 35mm F2.0 is designed for L-mount and supports autofocus, electronic aperture control, and EXIF data transmission on Panasonic Lumix S1H, S1, S5, S5 Mark II, S1R, S9, Sigma FP, FPL, and Leica SL and SL2 bodies.

Q: How good is the image quality compared to other 35mm primes?

Optical quality ranks at the 19th percentile in our database, which puts it in the bottom fifth of all 35mm primes we've tested. The aperture performance is better at the 68th percentile, so f/2 is usable, but overall sharpness and contrast will lag behind most competitors.

Q: Is this lens good for macro or close-up photography?

No. Macro performance scores just 19.3 out of 100, which is the weakest area for this lens. It ranks at the 13th percentile for macro capability, so you'll struggle with any close-up work. This is a portrait and street lens, not a macro tool.

Who Should Skip This

Skip this lens if you care about sharpness, contrast, or any kind of critical image quality. The 19th percentile optical score is a dealbreaker for landscape shooters, architecture photographers, or anyone who crops heavily. Macro shooters should absolutely look elsewhere, the 19.3/100 macro score is one of the worst we've seen. And if you're shooting on an L-mount body without IBIS, the lack of stabilization combined with the 35th percentile ranking means you'll be fighting camera shake in anything but bright light. This is a one-trick pony, and the trick is cheap bokeh.

Verdict

The Meike 35mm F2.0 is a lens you buy for one reason: you want f/2 bokeh on L-mount without spending real money. The 67th percentile bokeh score and 9-blade aperture deliver on that promise. But the 19th percentile optical performance is a constant reminder that you get what you pay for. If you're shooting portraits for fun, posting to social media, or just want a lightweight walkaround prime, it's fine. If you care about sharpness, contrast, or anything resembling professional image quality, the numbers say look elsewhere.

Usage Scores

Macro (17.8)Overall (49.8)Budget (90.8)Street (72.1)Travel (42.3)Portrait (41.4)Landscape (45.3)Professional (42.4)Video Cinema (31.2)Wildlife Sports (24.7)
  • Macro17.8
  • Overall49.8
  • Budget90.8
  • Street72.1
  • Travel42.3
  • Portrait41.4
  • Landscape45.3
  • Professional42.4
  • Video Cinema31.2
  • Wildlife Sports24.7

Similar Products