Intel Xeon E5-2600 E5-2667 v4 8-core LGA 2011-3

The Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 is an 8-core, 16-thread server CPU from the Broadwell-EP generation. It handles multi-threaded workloads reasonably well with a PassMark score of 13,807, but single-thread performance feels dated. It's only worth buying if you already have an LGA 2011-3 board and need a cheap server or workstation upgrade.

The multi-thread score of 13,807 is decent for an 8-core chip from 2016. It's in the 67th percentile of all CPUs we track, which translates to solid but unremarkable. For things like video encoding, 3D rendering, or running multiple VMs, it'll get the job done without making you wait forever. The 25MB of L3 cache helps keep those 16 threads fed, and the 3.6GHz boost clock means it can still sprint when it needs to.

Single-thread performance is where the age really shows. At 2,189 in PassMark single-thread, it's in the 63rd percentile. That's about average across all CPUs, but when you compare it to anything modern, it feels sluggish. Day-to-day tasks like opening apps or browsing with a ton of tabs won't feel snappy the way they do on a recent Ryzen or Core chip. The 135W TDP also means you'll need decent cooling, and your power bill won't thank you if this thing runs 24/7. Efficiency lands in the 57th percentile, so it's not terrible for a server chip, but it's no efficiency champion either.

Stacked against the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D, this Xeon gets absolutely demolished. The 9800X3D is a modern 8-core chip with 3D V-Cache that crushes both single-thread and multi-thread workloads while sipping power by comparison. If you're building a gaming or general productivity rig, there's no contest. The Ryzen 7 9800X3D is faster in every way that matters and costs less than the high-end European listings for this Xeon.

Against something like the Lenovo Ryzen 5 spare part or the G.Skill Trident Z Neo (which is actually RAM, so that's a weird comparison), the Xeon's only real advantage is ECC support and platform stability for server use. The EPYC chip in the competitor list is a different beast entirely, aimed at higher-end server workloads with way more cores. If you need a homelab CPU and you already have an LGA 2011-3 board, the E5-2667 v4 makes some sense. But if you're starting from scratch, a used Ryzen or a newer Xeon Scalable part will serve you better.

Value is tricky here because the price spread is genuinely wild. In the US you can find this chip for around $450, which honestly feels steep for an 8-core Broadwell part in 2025. But the European listings range from EUR 894 to EUR 1,237 across four different storefronts, and at the high end of that range you're paying new CPU money for old server silicon. If you're shopping in Europe, the EUR 894 listing is the one to look at, but even that is a tough sell unless you already own an LGA 2011-3 board and just need a drop-in upgrade. For most people, a used Ryzen 7 or even a newer Xeon from a later generation will give you more performance per dollar. The affordability score sits in the 15th percentile, which tells you everything you need to know.

The Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4 is a server chip from the Broadwell-EP era, sitting in that weird middle ground between retired enterprise hardware and budget workstation builds. It's an 8-core, 16-thread part with a 3.2GHz base clock, 3.6GHz boost, and 25MB of L3 cache. You'll find it on Socket LGA 2011-3 boards, which means DDR4 with ECC support and a 135W TDP. Pricing is all over the place depending on where you shop, from about $450 USD in the US to EUR 894-1,237 across European listings.

People searching for this chip are usually asking the same thing: is an old Xeon still worth buying in 2025? The short answer is maybe, if you know exactly what you're getting into. This isn't a gaming CPU, and it's not trying to be. It's a workstation and server processor that still handles multi-threaded productivity tasks reasonably well, but it shows its age in single-threaded workloads and platform features.

We pulled benchmark data from our database and compared it against everything else we've tested. The E5-2667 v4 lands at 13,807 in PassMark multi-thread and 2,189 in single-thread. That puts it solidly in the middle of the pack overall, with a total score of 52 out of 100. Not embarrassing, but not exactly a barn burner either.

Skip this chip if you're building a gaming PC, a general-purpose desktop, or anything where single-thread speed matters. The gaming score of 28.5 out of 100 tells the story, and you'll be much happier with a modern Ryzen 5 or Core i5. Also skip it if you don't already own an LGA 2011-3 board, since buying into a dead platform just to use an old Xeon rarely makes financial sense. If you need a server CPU but want better efficiency and newer features, look at used Xeon Scalable parts or even a Ryzen 7 with ECC support on a compatible board.

Should you buy the Intel Xeon E5-2667 v4? Only if you already own an LGA 2011-3 motherboard and need a cheap-ish upgrade for a server or workstation that runs multi-threaded workloads. It's still a capable chip for virtualization, file serving, or light rendering duties, and the ECC support is a real plus for anyone who cares about data integrity.

But for everyone else, this chip is hard to recommend. The single-thread performance is dated, the platform is a dead end, and the pricing is inconsistent enough that you might accidentally pay way too much. If you're building a new system, put your money into something modern. This Xeon is a niche part for a niche audience, and that's about it.