BLAZAR LENS Viper 35-75mm T2.1
Aucun prix actuel chez les marchands
Aperçu
Avantages et inconvénients
Points forts
- Strong bokeh (77th percentile) 77th
- Strong versatility (74th percentile) 74th
- Strong macro (65th percentile) 65th
Points faibles
- Below average affordability (0th percentile)
- Below average af (21st percentile)
- Below average build (31st percentile)
Les preuves
Performances
Caractéristiques techniques
Fiche technique complète
Optics
| Type | Prime |
| Focal Length Min | 35 |
| Focal Length Max | 75 |
Aperture
| Max Aperture | f/2.1 |
| Min Aperture | f/22 |
| Constant | Yes |
| Diaphragm Blades | 16 |
Build
| Mount | ARRI PL |
| Format | full-frame |
| Weight | 0.6 kg / 1.3 lbs |
| Filter Thread | 77 |
AF & Stabilization
| AF Type | manual focus only |
| Stabilization | No |
Focus
| Min Focus Distance | 370 |
Face à la concurrence
| Spec | BLAZAR LENS Viper 35-75mm T2.1 | Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z | Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2 LAB FE | Sony G Master FE 50-150mm f/2 GM | Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC | Tamron Di III 70-180mm f/2.8 VC VXD G2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focal Length | 35-75mm | 24-105mm | 35mm | 50-150mm | 17-40mm | 70-180mm |
| Max Aperture | f/2.1 | f/2.8 | f/1.2 | f/2 | f/1.8 | f/2.8 |
| Mount | ARRI PL | Canon RF | Sony E | Sony E | Fujifilm X | Sony E |
| Format Coverage | full-frame | full-frame | full-frame | full-frame | APS-C | full-frame |
| Stabilization | false | true | false | false | false | true |
| Weather Sealed | false | true | true | true | true | true |
| Weight (g) | 579 | 1315 | 910 | 1340 | 535 | 855 |
| AF Type | manual focus only | Nano USM | VCM | XD linear motors | HLA (High-response Linear Actuator) | VXD |
| Lens Type | prime | zoom | prime | zoom | zoom | zoom |
| Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare | Compare |
| Produit | AF | Bokeh | Build | Macro | Reach | Video | Aperture | Wide Angle | Portability | Versatility | Affordability | Stabilization |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLAZAR LENS Viper 35-75mm T2.1 | 20.9 | 77 | 30.6 | 65.2 | 59.3 | 59.5 | 59.3 | 53.2 | 42.1 | 73.7 | 0 | 36.2 |
| Canon RF 24-105mm f/2.8 L IS USM Z Compare | 90.1 | 78.8 | 95 | 69.5 | 73.9 | 87.9 | 44 | 74.4 | 11.1 | 91.9 | 8.1 | 96 |
| Viltrox LAB AF 35mm f/1.2 LAB FE Compare | 95.4 | 69 | 90.5 | 45.3 | 29.5 | 72.1 | 96.1 | 53.2 | 20.6 | 33 | 33.4 | 36.2 |
| Sony G Master FE 50-150mm f/2 GM Compare | 95.4 | 95.9 | 98.8 | 52 | 80.3 | 87.9 | 64.3 | 39.9 | 10.8 | 82.3 | 7.4 | 36.2 |
| Sigma Art 17-40mm f/1.8 DC Compare | 95.4 | 53.2 | 95 | 54.3 | 53.2 | 87.9 | 74.9 | 68.6 | 47.1 | 75.4 | 33.6 | 36.2 |
| Tamron Di III 70-180mm f/2.8 VC VXD G2 Compare | 95.4 | 86.5 | 77.2 | 75.8 | 81.1 | 84.1 | 44 | 29.2 | 21.8 | 77.5 | 27.7 | 97.3 |
Prix
Rapport qualité-prix
Nous suivons les prix de ce produit depuis le 8 nov. 2026. Le graphique apparaîtra dès que nous aurons plus de données.
Scores par usage
- Macro31.8
- Global39.5
- Budget26.2
- Street42.8
- Travel34.8
- Portrait51.3
- Landscape36
- Professional35.2
- Video Cinema45.5
- Wildlife Sports22
Un test complet arrive bientôt. Les caractéristiques, scores, prix et graphiques ci-dessus sont toujours à jour.