SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
SanDisk
89 Score global
vs
Acclamator N20 512GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
Acclamator
51 Score global
Scores
Console
Workstation
Gaming
Budget
Laptop
Portable
Spécifications
| SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 | Acclamator N20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Drive | ||
| Capacity | ||
| Form Factor | M.2 2280 | M.2 2280 |
| Interface | PCIe 5.0 x4 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
| Protocol | NVMe | NVMe |
| PCIe Generation | 5★ | 3 |
| External | ✗ | ✗ |
| Performance | ||
| Sequential Read (MB/s) | ||
| Sequential Write (MB/s) | Pas de données | |
| Random Read (IOPS) | Pas de données | |
| Random Write (IOPS) | Pas de données | |
| Hardware | ||
| NAND | TLC | TLC |
| DRAM Cache | ✗ | ✗ |
| Controller | nCache 4.0 | — |
| Reliability | ||
| Endurance (TBW) | ||
| MTBF (hours) | ||
| Warranty (years) | 5★ | 3 |
| Features | ||
| Heatsink | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Hardware Encryption | ✓★ | — |
Avantages & Inconvénients
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong random (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong speed (99th percentile)99th %ile
- Strong capacity (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong feature (89th percentile)89th %ile
- Below average affordability (2nd percentile)2nd %ile
Acclamator N20 512GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280
- Strong affordability (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong endurance (75th percentile)
- Below average capacity (35th percentile)
Prix
SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100 8TB PCIe 5.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.030score par dollar
vs
Acclamator N20 512GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 22800.397score par dollar
Acclamator N20 512GB PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe M.2 2280 offre un rapport qualité-prix 13.2x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: SanDisk Optimus GX PRO 8100
Scores 89 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 11 of 18 specs.
