Technics EAH-AZ100 vs Sennheiser CX 350BT
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 Score global
vs
Sennheiser CX 350BT
Sennheiser
38 Score global
Ce que disent les acheteurs
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 sur 100 confiance moyenne 28 avis
Les écouteurs Technics EAH-AZ100 sont largement salués pour leur qualité sonore exceptionnelle, avec des basses profondes, des aigus clairs et un son immersif. Le confort, l'autonomie et la réduction de bruit sont également souvent loués, bien que certains utilisateurs trouvent le prix élevé et le volume insuffisant. Quelques problèmes mineurs comme les déconnexions Bluetooth LE et l'appairage multi-appareils ont été mentionnés, mais le sentiment général est très positif.
Points forts
- Qualité sonore exceptionnelle
- Basses profondes et immersives
- Réduction de bruit efficace
- Confortable à porter
- Excellente autonomie
Points faibles
- Prix élevé
- Volume maximal limité
- Déconnexions Bluetooth LE
- Problèmes d'appairage multi-appareils
- Extérieur en plastique
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
Sennheiser CX 350BT
Pas encore de retours clients
Scores
Calls
Travel
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
Budget
Spécifications
| Technics EAH-AZ100 | Sennheiser CX 350BT | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | canal |
| Ear Tips | 5 x Eartip Pairs | XS, S, M, L |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | 0.01 kg |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | — |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 17 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | 20 kHz |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 28 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | SBC, AAC, AptX, AptX Low Latency |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos, Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | — |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | 5.0 |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | A2DP, AVRCP, HSP, HFP |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | USB-C |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 10 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | fast USB-C charging |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs★ | — |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | Siri, Google Assistant |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | Smart Control |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | — |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | — |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
Sennheiser CX 350BT
- Strong connectivity (94th percentile)94th %ile
- Strong comfort (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong sound (85th percentile)85th %ile
- Below average battery (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average affordability (21st percentile)
- Below average anc (31st percentile)
- Below average social proof (34th percentile)
Prix
Verdict
Gagnant: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 14 of 39 specs.
