Technics EAH-AZ100 vs Skullcandy Grind S2GTW-P751
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 Score global
vs
Skullcandy Grind S2GTW-P751
Skullcandy
35 Score global
Ce que disent les acheteurs
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 sur 100 confiance moyenne 28 avis
Les écouteurs Technics EAH-AZ100 sont largement salués pour leur qualité sonore exceptionnelle, avec des basses profondes, des aigus clairs et un son immersif. Le confort, l'autonomie et la réduction de bruit sont également souvent loués, bien que certains utilisateurs trouvent le prix élevé et le volume insuffisant. Quelques problèmes mineurs comme les déconnexions Bluetooth LE et l'appairage multi-appareils ont été mentionnés, mais le sentiment général est très positif.
Points forts
- Qualité sonore exceptionnelle
- Basses profondes et immersives
- Réduction de bruit efficace
- Confortable à porter
- Excellente autonomie
Points faibles
- Prix élevé
- Volume maximal limité
- Déconnexions Bluetooth LE
- Problèmes d'appairage multi-appareils
- Extérieur en plastique
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
Skullcandy Grind S2GTW-P751
Pas encore de retours clients
Scores
Calls
Travel
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
Budget
Spécifications
| Technics EAH-AZ100 | Skullcandy Grind S2GTW-P751 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | true wireless | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | 5 x Eartip Pairs | — |
| Weight | 0.01 kg★ | — |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | — |
| Driver Size | 10 mm★ | — |
| Drivers | 1★ | — |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz★ | — |
| Freq Max | 40 kHz★ | — |
| Impedance | 16 Ω | 22 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | ✓★ | — |
| Codecs | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC | Skullcandy Grind Wireless Earbuds, Bluetooth Headphones, Up to 40 Hours Battery, Noise Isolating Fit, Microphone for iPhone Android, Customizable via Skull-iQ App - Light Grey/Blue |
| Surround | Dolby Atmos, Spatial Audio | — |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓★ | ✗ |
| ANC Type | adaptive | — |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3★ | 5.0 |
| Profiles | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP | — |
| Multipoint | ✓★ | — |
| Wired Connector | Bluetooth | — |
| Range | 10 m★ | — |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 8 hrs | 40 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | 2.5 hrs★ | — |
| Fast Charging | 15 min. for 90 min. playback | — |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 28 hrs | 40 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Mic Count | 6★ | — |
| NC Mic | ✓★ | — |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | Google Assistant, Siri | Alexa |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Android & iOS | Skull-iQ App |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | — |
| Gaming Mode | ✗ | — |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IPX4 | Water-Resistant |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
Skullcandy Grind S2GTW-P751
- Strong battery (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong build (71st percentile)
- Strong connectivity (69th percentile)
- Below average mic (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average comfort (27th percentile)
- Below average sound (27th percentile)
- Below average affordability (34th percentile)
Prix
Technics EAH-AZ1000.303score par dollar
vs
Skullcandy Grind S2GTW-P7510.246score par dollar
Technics EAH-AZ100 offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.2x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 15 of 39 specs.
