Hearprotek SE03T vs Technics EAH-AZ100
Hearprotek SE03T
Hearprotek
22 Score global
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 Score global
Ce que disent les acheteurs
Hearprotek SE03T
Pas encore de retours clients
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 sur 100 confiance moyenne 28 avis
Les écouteurs Technics EAH-AZ100 sont largement salués pour leur qualité sonore exceptionnelle, avec des basses profondes, des aigus clairs et un son immersif. Le confort, l'autonomie et la réduction de bruit sont également souvent loués, bien que certains utilisateurs trouvent le prix élevé et le volume insuffisant. Quelques problèmes mineurs comme les déconnexions Bluetooth LE et l'appairage multi-appareils ont été mentionnés, mais le sentiment général est très positif.
Points forts
- Qualité sonore exceptionnelle
- Basses profondes et immersives
- Réduction de bruit efficace
- Confortable à porter
- Excellente autonomie
Points faibles
- Prix élevé
- Volume maximal limité
- Déconnexions Bluetooth LE
- Problèmes d'appairage multi-appareils
- Extérieur en plastique
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
Scores
Calls
Travel
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
Budget
Spécifications
| Hearprotek SE03T | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | in-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | — | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | — | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | — | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | — | 1★ |
| Freq Min | — | 20 Hz★ |
| Freq Max | — | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | Hearprotek Sleep Headphones, 1 Pair USB C Wired Earbuds with Soft Silicone Noise Reduction Type C Earbuds with Microphone, Ideal for Sleeping, snoring, Relaxation (Black) | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | — | Dolby Atmos, Spatial Audio |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✓ | ✓ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | — | ✓★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✗ | ✓★ |
| Bluetooth | — | 5.3★ |
| Profiles | — | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | — | ✓★ |
| Wired Connector | — | Bluetooth |
| Range | — | 10 m★ |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | — | 8 hrs★ |
| Charge Time | — | 2.5 hrs★ |
| Fast Charging | — | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | — | 28 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | — | ✓★ |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | — | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | — | ✓★ |
| App | — | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | — | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | — | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | — | IPX4 |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Hearprotek SE03T
- Strong affordability (83rd percentile)83rd %ile
- Strong anc (74th percentile)
- Strong mic (65th percentile)
- Below average connectivity (11th percentile)11th %ile
- Below average social proof (27th percentile)
- Below average comfort (27th percentile)
- Below average sound (27th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
Prix
Hearprotek SE03T0.488score par dollar
vs
Technics EAH-AZ1000.303score par dollar
Hearprotek SE03T offre un rapport qualité-prix 1.6x meilleur
Verdict
Gagnant: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 39 specs.
