Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 vs Technics EAH-AZ100
Beyerdynamic Amiron 200
Beyerdynamic
53 Score global
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100
Technics
100 Score global
Ce que disent les acheteurs
Beyerdynamic Amiron 200
Pas encore de retours clients
Technics EAH-AZ100
88 sur 100 confiance moyenne 28 avis
Les écouteurs Technics EAH-AZ100 sont largement salués pour leur qualité sonore exceptionnelle, avec des basses profondes, des aigus clairs et un son immersif. Le confort, l'autonomie et la réduction de bruit sont également souvent loués, bien que certains utilisateurs trouvent le prix élevé et le volume insuffisant. Quelques problèmes mineurs comme les déconnexions Bluetooth LE et l'appairage multi-appareils ont été mentionnés, mais le sentiment général est très positif.
Points forts
- Qualité sonore exceptionnelle
- Basses profondes et immersives
- Réduction de bruit efficace
- Confortable à porter
- Excellente autonomie
Points faibles
- Prix élevé
- Volume maximal limité
- Déconnexions Bluetooth LE
- Problèmes d'appairage multi-appareils
- Extérieur en plastique
Sound quality 12
Bass performance 6
Noise cancellation 5
Comfort 6
Battery life 5
Value for money 4
Scores
Calls
Travel
Music
Commute
Gaming
Fitness
Budget
Spécifications
| Beyerdynamic Amiron 200 | Technics EAH-AZ100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Design | ||
| Form Factor | open-ear | in-ear |
| Wearing Style | Dual Ear True Wireless with Ear Clip/Hook | true wireless |
| Ear Tips | — | 5 x Eartip Pairs |
| Weight | 0.08 kg | 0.01 kg★ |
| Audio | ||
| Driver Type | dynamic | dynamic |
| Driver Size | — | 10 mm★ |
| Drivers | 1 | 1 |
| Freq Min | 20 Hz | 20 Hz |
| Freq Max | 20 kHz | 40 kHz★ |
| Impedance | — | 16 Ω |
| Hi-Res Audio | — | ✓★ |
| Codecs | AAC, SBC | AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC |
| Surround | Beyerdynamic AMIRON 200 True Wireless Bluetooth Earbuds w/Ear Hooks. Running, Biking, Sport, Fitness Open Headphones with 36Hrs Playtime. IP54 Weather Resistant Earphones, Lightweight, Mic. (Sport) | | Dolby Atmos, Spatial Audio |
| Noise Control | ||
| ANC | ✗ | ✓★ |
| ANC Type | — | adaptive |
| Transparency | ✓ | ✓ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | 5.3 | 5.3 |
| Profiles | HFP, A2DP, AVRCP | AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP |
| Multipoint | ✓ | ✓ |
| Wired Connector | USB-C | Bluetooth |
| Range | 15 m★ | 10 m |
| Earbud Battery | ||
| Battery Life | 11 hrs★ | 8 hrs |
| Charge Time | 2 hrs★ | 2.5 hrs |
| Fast Charging | 5 Minutes for 1.5 Hours | 15 min. for 90 min. playback |
| Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Case Battery | ||
| Case Battery | 25 hrs | 28 hrs★ |
| Case Charging | USB-C | USB-C |
| Wireless Charging | ✓ | ✓ |
| Capacity | 70 mAh★ | — |
| Microphone | ||
| Microphone | ✓ | ✓ |
| Mic Count | 2 | 6★ |
| NC Mic | ✓ | ✓ |
| Features | ||
| Voice Assistant | — | Google Assistant, Siri |
| Touch Controls | ✓ | ✓ |
| App | Beyerdynamic APP | Android & iOS |
| Volume Limiting | ✗ | ✗ |
| Gaming Mode | — | ✗ |
| Bone Conduction | ✗ | ✗ |
| Water Resistance | IP54 | IPX4 |
Avantages & Inconvénients
Beyerdynamic Amiron 200
- Strong connectivity (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong mic (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong battery (79th percentile)
- Strong sound (75th percentile)
- Below average affordability (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average social proof (19th percentile)19th %ile
- Below average build (34th percentile)
Technics EAH-AZ100
- Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
- Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile
Prix
Verdict
Gagnant: Technics EAH-AZ100
Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 7 of 40 specs.
