Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 vs MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 10-core LGA 2011-3

Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 10-core LGA 2011-3

Intel
46 Score global
vs
MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

MICRO CENTER
66 Score global

Scores

Productivity
Intel
57
MICRO CENTER
75
Efficiency
Intel
35
MICRO CENTER
65
Gaming
Intel
25
MICRO CENTER
61
Budget
Intel
46
MICRO CENTER
59
Ai Llm
Intel
44
MICRO CENTER
56
Server
Intel
54
MICRO CENTER
54

Spécifications

Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF
Processor
BrandIntel—
SeriesXeon—
ModelE5-2640 v4—
Classserver—
Cores & Clocks
Cores10★—
Threads20★—
Base Clock
2,400
Pas de données
Boost Clock
3,400
Pas de données
Cache
L2 Cache1.5★—
L3 Cache25★—
Performance
PassMark Multi
12,387
70,111
PassMark Single
1,975
4,737
Memory
Memory TypeDDR4★—
Max Speed
2,133
Pas de données
Max Memory
1,536
Pas de données
ECC✓★—
Platform & Power
SocketLGA 2011-3—
TDP90★—

Avantages & Inconvénients

Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 10-core LGA 2011-3

  • Strong affordability (96th percentile)96th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (66th percentile)
  • Below average feature (21st percentile)

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

  • Strong single thread (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong multi thread (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Strong ai (86th percentile)86th %ile
  • Strong efficiency (67th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (6th percentile)6th %ile
  • Below average platform (17th percentile)17th %ile
  • Below average feature (21st percentile)

Prix

Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4 10-core LGA 2011-3

No current pricing available

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

Verdict

★ Gagnant: MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF

Scores 66 overall, wins 5 of 6 usage categories and 2 of 18 specs.

MICRO CENTER 9950X3DMAGX870ETMKWF Meilleur pour:

Ai LlmBudgetGamingEfficiencyProductivity

A considérer aussi