FACLAM DC103 vs SJCAM C400
FACLAM DC103 Black
FACLAM
44 Score global
vs
SJCAM C400
SJCAM
50 Score global
Scores
Beginner
Youtube
Video
Product Photography
Vlogging
Wedding Events
Travel
Streaming
Sports Wildlife
Photography
Spécifications
| FACLAM DC103 | SJCAM C400 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Size | micro-four-thirds | — |
| Megapixels | 64 MP★ | — |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| Log Profile | ✓ | ✓ |
| Codec | — | MP4 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | — | 2.3"★ |
| Touchscreen | — | ✓★ |
| Articulating | ✓ | ✓ |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | — | ✓★ |
| Weight | — | 0.78 kg★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | — | ✗ |
Avantages & Inconvénients
FACLAM DC103 Black
- Strong affordability (84th percentile)84th %ile
- Strong social proof (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong sensor (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong display (73rd percentile)
- Below average burst (34th percentile)
SJCAM C400
- Strong display (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong build (87th percentile)87th %ile
- Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
- Strong social proof (73rd percentile)
- Below average sensor (33rd percentile)
- Below average burst (34th percentile)
Verdict
Gagnant: SJCAM C400
Scores 50 overall, wins 7 of 10 usage categories and 4 of 13 specs.