New

Samsung 870 QVO 1TB SATA III 2.5"

★★★★★ 4.8 (26,184)

The 870 QVO hits SATA's 560 MB/s read and 530 MB/s write ceiling with QLC NAND and a DRAM cache, plus 360 TBW endurance. Its 1TB capacity and 2.5-inch form factor make it a straightforward drop-in upgrade for older desktops and laptops. Best for budget-conscious users replacing a mechanical drive for faster boot times and everyday file transfers.

Capacity 1TB
Form Factor 2.5"
Interface SATA III
Read Speed 560 MB/s
NAND QLC
DRAM Cache Yes
Endurance 360 TBW
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB SATA III 2.5" ssd
66 Overall Score
Also available in:

Snapshot

The 30-Second Version

The 870 QVO is a cheap, high-capacity SATA drive that's great for reading and rough for writing. Buy it for storage, not for speed, and only if you find it under USD 110.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Huge capacity options up to 8TB in a 2.5-inch form factor 95th
  • SATA max sequential speeds, 560 MB/s read and 530 MB/s write 84th
  • DRAM cache keeps everyday performance snappy 79th
  • Samsung Magician software is genuinely useful for health monitoring 66th
  • Easy drop-in upgrade for old laptops and desktops

Cons

  • QLC NAND means sustained writes fall off a cliff once the cache fills
  • 360 TBW endurance is mediocre for a 1TB drive
  • 1-year warranty feels short for a Samsung drive
  • Price is all over the place, from USD 98 to USD 358 depending on the vendor

What owners think

The Word on the Street

4.8/5 (26184 reviews)
👍 Owners love how easy it is to drop this into an old laptop or PS4 and watch it come back to life.
👍 A lot of buyers are impressed by the speed and reliability for the price, especially as a replacement for aging mechanical drives.
🤔 Some users coming from an SSHD didn't see a huge speed jump, but they still consider it a solid reliability upgrade.

How owner sentiment changed over time

Exclusive

Based on when customers actually wrote their reviews - so you can see whether early praise held up.

Owner sentiment has held steady over time
88/100Our AI sentiment readlow confidence · 9 sources · Nov 2026
1★2★3★4★5★Q4 '20: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '21: 5.0★ · 2 reviewsQ3 '21: 5.0★ · 2 reviewsQ4 '21: 4.0★ · 1 reviewQ1 '22: 3.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '22: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ4 '22: 1.0★ · 1 reviewQ4 '23: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ4 '24: 5.0★ · 2 reviewsQ1 '25: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ2 '25: 5.0★ · 2 reviewsQ4 '25: 5.0★ · 1 reviewQ1 '26: 5.0★ · 1 review1221111121211Q4 '20Q2 '21Q3 '21Q4 '21Q1 '22Q2 '22Q4 '22Q4 '23Q4 '24Q1 '25Q2 '25Q4 '25Q1 '26
Avg ratingHappy (4-5★)Unhappy (1-2★)Bar height = number of reviews

Based on 17 dated customer reviews, grouped by calendar quarter. Period analysis is in English.

The proof

Performance

Sequential speeds are right at the SATA limit, 560 MB/s read and 530 MB/s write, so you're getting everything the interface can give you. Random performance is where things get honest. 98K random read IOPS and 88K random write IOPS land this drive in the middle of the pack, around the 44th percentile for random and 38th for speed overall. That's fine for everyday use, but it's not going to impress anyone who's used to a decent NVMe drive. The QLC NAND means sustained writes drop hard once the SLC cache fills up. One owner put it bluntly: great for heavy reading, terrible for heavy writing. If you're moving hundreds of gigabytes regularly, you'll feel it. For normal people doing normal things, it's quick enough that you won't think about it.

Performance Percentiles

Speed 38.4
Random 44.4
Feature 84.4
Capacity 55.3
User Sentiment 79.1
Endurance 66.1
Social Proof 95.3
Affordability 26.6

Specifications

Full Specifications

Drive

Capacity 1000
Form Factor 2.5"
Interface SATA III
Protocol SATA
External No

Performance

Sequential Read (MB/s) 560
Sequential Write (MB/s) 530
Random Read (IOPS) 98000
Random Write (IOPS) 88000

Hardware

NAND QLC
DRAM Cache Yes
Controller MKX

Reliability

Endurance (TBW) 360
MTBF (hours) 1500000
Warranty (years) 1

Features

Heatsink No
Hardware Encryption Yes

vs Competition

The 870 QVO sits in a weird spot. Against the Crucial T500 or Western Digital WD_BLACK SN7100, both NVMe drives, the QVO gets smoked on raw speed. But those drives aren't SATA, so if you're upgrading an older machine without an M.2 slot, they're not even options. The more honest comparison is against Samsung's own 870 EVO. The EVO uses TLC NAND, which means better sustained writes and higher endurance, but it costs more. If you're just storing games or media, the QVO is fine. If you're doing anything write-heavy, the EVO is worth the extra cash. The Micron T710 and MSI SPATIUM M480 PRO are both NVMe drives that make the QVO look ancient on paper, but again, different form factor, different use case.

Spec Samsung 870 QVO Western Digital Black SN850X Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/4T0 Crucial T710 Seagate FireCuda 530R ZP4000GM3A073 SanDisk WD_BLACK WDS800T1X0M
Capacity 1TB 4TB 4TB 4TB 4TB 8TB
Form Factor 2.5" M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 2280 M.2 M.2 2280
Interface SATA III PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 5.0 x4 PCIe 5.0 x4 PCIe 4.0 x4 PCIe 5.0 x4
Seq Read 560 MB/s 7,300 MB/s 14,800 MB/s 14,500 MB/s 7,400 MB/s 14,900 MB/s
Nand Type QLC TLC TLC TLC TLC TLC
Dram Cache true true true false false true
Endurance 360 TBW 2400 TBW 4000 TBW 2400 TBW 5050 TBW 4800 TBW
Compare Compare Compare Compare Compare
Product SpeedRandomFeatureCapacityUser SentimentEnduranceSocial ProofAffordability
Samsung 870 QVO 38.444.484.455.379.166.195.326.6
Western Digital Black SN850X Compare 8995.789.392.594.78895.39.5
Kingston FURY Renegade G5 SFYR2S/4T0 Compare 99.59990.992.5093.587.16.5
Crucial T710 Compare 99.199.185.592.5085.877.410.6
Seagate FireCuda 530R ZP4000GM3A073 Compare 92.896.878.492.5095.677.46.9
SanDisk WD_BLACK WDS800T1X0M Compare 99.199.397.598080.645.13.1

Price

Value & Pricing

Value is a weird one here. The price spread across US vendors is wild, anywhere from USD 98 to USD 358 for the same 1TB drive. At the low end, this is a no-brainer for bulk SATA storage. At the high end, you're getting robbed. Newegg has the best deal right now at USD 98, and that's the only price that makes sense. The 870 QVO is a budget drive, and it only works as a budget drive. Pay more than about USD 110 and you should be looking at a TLC drive with better endurance instead.

From CA$934 1 offer across 1 retailer
Amazon 1 offer From CA$934

Price History

CA$930 CA$935 CA$940 CA$945 CA$950 Nov 8Nov 14 CA$934

Read more

Overview

The Samsung 870 QVO is the drive you buy when you need a lot of cheap SATA storage and you're done pretending every drive needs to be an NVMe speed demon. It's a 1TB 2.5-inch SATA III SSD with QLC NAND, a DRAM cache, and Samsung's MKX controller. The headline numbers are 560 MB/s read and 530 MB/s write, which is basically the ceiling for SATA. But the real story is endurance and sustained write behavior. At 360 TBW and a 1-year warranty, this is not a drive for heavy write workloads. For a game library, media storage, or breathing life into an old laptop, it's a solid pick. Just don't expect it to hang with TLC drives when the cache runs dry.

Common Questions

Q: Can I put this in my HP laptop?

Yes, as long as your laptop has a 2.5-inch SATA bay. It's a standard form factor, so it'll drop right in where an old hard drive or SSHD used to be.

Q: What's the difference between the 870 QVO and the 870 EVO?

The QVO uses QLC NAND, which is cheaper but slower on sustained writes and has lower endurance. The EVO uses TLC NAND, which holds up better under heavy writing. For most people just storing games and media, the QVO is fine. If you're doing a lot of writing, get the EVO.

Q: Does it come with software to migrate my old drive?

Yes, Samsung includes their migration software, so you can clone your old drive over without reinstalling Windows from scratch.

Who Should Skip This

If you're doing heavy video editing, constant large file transfers, or running a database, this isn't your drive. The QLC NAND and 360 TBW endurance will bite you. Go get a TLC drive like the Samsung 870 EVO or a decent NVMe drive with better sustained write performance instead. This is a storage drive, not a workhorse.

Verdict

The Samsung 870 QVO is a good drive for a specific job: cheap, high-capacity SATA storage that mostly gets read. It's not a performance drive, and it's not built for heavy writes. The 360 TBW endurance and 1-year warranty are the weak points, and the QLC NAND means sustained write performance is genuinely bad once the cache fills. But for a game library, a media drive, or reviving an old laptop, it's hard to beat at the right price. Just make sure you're paying the right price. USD 98 from Newegg is a deal. USD 358 is a scam.

Usage Scores

Overall (66.3)Budget (74)Gaming (49.4)Laptop (59.6)Console (25.5)Portable (16)Workstation (52.8)
  • Overall66.3
  • Budget74
  • Gaming49.4
  • Laptop59.6
  • Console25.5
  • Portable16
  • Workstation52.8

Other Configurations2

Similar Products