Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)
Team Group
84 Overall Score
vs
GIGASTONE
GIGASTONE
44 Overall Score
Scores
Gaming
Budget
Workstation
Laptop
Server
Specifications
| Team Group | GIGASTONE | |
|---|---|---|
| Memory | ||
| Type | DDR5★ | DDR4 |
| Form Factor | UDIMM | UDIMM |
| Total Capacity | ||
| Modules | 2★ | — |
| Per Module | No data | |
| Pins | 288 | — |
| Rank | 1Rx8 | — |
| Performance | ||
| Speed | ||
| CAS Latency | 32★ | — |
| Timings | 32-39-39-84 | — |
| Voltage | 1.350000023841858★ | — |
| Class | ||
| ECC | ✗ | — |
| Registered | ✗ | — |
| OC Profile | Intel XMP 3.0 | — |
| Features | ||
| RGB | ✗ | — |
| Heat Spreader | ✓★ | — |
Pros & Cons
Team Group (CTCED532G6400HC32ADC01)
- Strong speed (95th percentile)95th %ile
- Strong social proof (92nd percentile)92nd %ile
- Strong latency (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong feature (75th percentile)
- Below average affordability (24th percentile)
GIGASTONE
- Strong capacity (71st percentile)
- Below average latency (12th percentile)12th %ile
- Below average feature (18th percentile)18th %ile
Pricing
Verdict
Winner: Team Group
Scores 84 overall, wins 5 of 5 usage categories and 7 of 16 specs.
