CCA ZAS vs Technics EAH-AZ100

CCA ZAS

CCA ZAS

CCA
36 Overall Score
vs
Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics EAH-AZ100

Technics
100 Overall Score

What Buyers Say

CCA ZAS

72 out of 100 low confidence 7 reviews

The KZ ZAS earphones receive mostly positive feedback for their crisp, balanced sound and excellent value for money, especially compared to pricier competitors like Shure SE215s. However, a few users report durability issues with blown speakers and less-than-ideal fit, while one reviewer finds them lacking in sonic balance despite the low price. Overall, they are praised as a great budget option for gaming and music, but quality control may be a concern.

Pros
  • Crisp and balanced sound
  • Excellent value for money
  • Great for gaming and music
  • Outperforms pricier competitors like Shure SE215
  • Good instrument separation and clarity
Cons
  • Durability issues with blown speakers
  • Less-than-ideal fit for some users
  • Not as balanced as expected by some
  • Requires cable replacement research
  • May need equalizer for gaming
👍 Sound quality 5
👍 Value for money 4
👎 Durability 1
👎 Fit and comfort 2
👍 Gaming performance 2
👍 Comparison to competitors 3

Technics EAH-AZ100

88 out of 100 medium confidence 28 reviews

The Technics EAH-AZ100 earbuds are overwhelmingly praised for their exceptional sound quality, with users highlighting deep bass, clear highs, and immersive audio. Comfort, battery life, and noise cancellation are also frequently commended, though some users note the price is high and volume could be louder. A few minor issues like Bluetooth LE disconnects and initial multi-device pairing were mentioned, but overall sentiment is very positive.

Pros
  • Exceptional sound quality
  • Deep immersive bass
  • Effective noise cancellation
  • Comfortable fit
  • Excellent battery life
Cons
  • High price point
  • Limited maximum volume
  • Bluetooth LE disconnects
  • Initial multi-device pairing issues
  • Plastic exterior
👍 Sound quality 12
👍 Bass performance 6
👍 Noise cancellation 5
👍 Comfort 6
👍 Battery life 5
🤔 Value for money 4

Scores

Calls
CCA
26
Technics
100
Travel
CCA
28
Technics
100
Music
CCA
45
Technics
94
Commute
CCA
28
Technics
94
Gaming
CCA
39
Technics
92
Fitness
CCA
29
Technics
88
Budget
CCA
51
Technics
88

Specifications

CCA ZASTechnics EAH-AZ100
Design
Form Factorin-earin-ear
Wearing StyleRounded tips for ear canaltrue wireless
Ear Tipss5 x Eartip Pairs
Weight0.09 kg0.01 kg★
Audio
Driver Typehybriddynamic
Driver Size10 mm10 mm
Drivers8★1
Freq Min—20 Hz★
Freq Max—40 kHz★
Impedance24 Ω16 Ω
Sensitivity109 dB★—
Hi-Res Audio✓✓
Codecs—AAC, LC3, LDAC, SBC
Surround—Dolby Atmos, Spatial Audio
Noise Control
ANC✗✓★
ANC Type—adaptive
Transparency—✓★
Connectivity
Wireless✗✓★
Bluetooth—5.3★
Profiles—AVRCP, A2DP, HSP, HFP, TMAP, PBP
Multipoint—✓★
Wired ConnectorAudio jackBluetooth
Range—10 m★
Earbud Battery
Battery Life—8 hrs★
Charge Time—2.5 hrs★
Fast Charging—15 min. for 90 min. playback
Charging—USB-C★
Case Battery
Case Battery—28 hrs★
Case Charging—USB-C★
Wireless Charging—✓★
Microphone
Microphone✓✓
Mic Count—6★
NC Mic—✓★
Features
Voice Assistant—Google Assistant, Siri
Touch Controls✓✓
App—Android & iOS
Volume Limiting—✗
Gaming Mode—✗
Bone Conduction—✗
Water Resistance—IPX4

Pros & Cons

CCA ZAS

  • Strong sound (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong comfort (70th percentile)
  • Below average affordability (30th percentile)
  • Below average anc (31st percentile)
  • Below average user sentiment (34th percentile)
  • Below average build (34th percentile)

Technics EAH-AZ100

  • Strong connectivity (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong sound (100th percentile)100th %ile
  • Strong anc (98th percentile)98th %ile
  • Strong mic (97th percentile)97th %ile
  • Below average affordability (3rd percentile)3rd %ile

Pricing

CCA ZAS is CA$225 cheaper (3.1x less).

Verdict

★ Winner: Technics EAH-AZ100

Scores 100 overall, wins 7 of 7 usage categories and 17 of 40 specs.

Technics EAH-AZ100 Better at:

CallsMusicBudgetGamingTravelCommuteFitness

Also Consider