Sony Alpha a6700 vs Olympus OM-D E-M10
Sony Alpha a6700 Black 2023
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Silver
What Buyers Say
Sony Alpha a6700 Black 2023
The Sony A6700 is widely praised for its exceptional autofocus, compact size, and impressive image quality, making it a popular upgrade for both enthusiasts and professionals. However, several users report overheating issues, occasional defects like dust in the viewfinder or lens, and the lack of a battery charger in the box. Despite these drawbacks, most reviewers find it a worthy investment, especially for travel and wildlife photography.
Pros
- Exceptional autofocus
- Compact and lightweight
- Great image quality
- Excellent video capabilities
- Improved battery life
Cons
- Overheating issues
- No battery charger included
- Dust in viewfinder/lens
- Occasional defects
- No built-in flash
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Silver
The Olympus OM-D E-M10 is praised for its compact size, light weight, and excellent image quality, making it a favorite for hiking and travel. Users appreciate the tilting LCD, intuitive controls, and effective image stabilization. However, some find the menu system confusing and the battery life poor, and the lack of an electronic shutter is noted. Overall, it's seen as a great value for the price.
Pros
- Compact and lightweight body
- Excellent image quality
- Tilting LCD screen
- Intuitive controls and dials
- Effective image stabilization
Cons
- Confusing menu system
- Poor battery life
- No electronic shutter
- So-so EVF quality
- Small body can be too small
Scores
Specifications
| Sony Alpha a6700 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | CMOS | Live MOS |
| Size | aps-c | micro-four-thirds |
| Megapixels | 26 MP★ | 16.100000381469727 MP |
| ISO Range | 100 | 100 |
| Processor | BIONZ XR | TruePic VII |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | ||
| AF Type | PhotoPhase Detection: 759VideoPhase Detection: 495 | Contrast Detection: 81 |
| Eye AF | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Animal AF | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Subject Detection | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 11 fps★ | 8 fps |
| Burst (Electronic) | 11 fps★ | — |
| Max Shutter | 1/8000 | — |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K★ | 1080p |
| 4K FPS | 120 fps★ | — |
| 1080p FPS | 240 fps★ | 30 fps |
| 10-bit | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Log Profile | ✓★ | ✗ |
| RAW Video | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Codec | XAVC HS, XAVC S-I | H.264, motion JPEG |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3" | 3" |
| Touchscreen | ✓ | ✓ |
| Articulating | ✓ | ✓ |
| EVF Resolution | 2.4M dots★ | 1.4M dots |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Weight | 0.41 kg | 0.40 kg★ |
| Battery Life | 550 shots★ | — |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | ✓★ | ✗ |
| USB | USB-C★ | — |
| HDMI | Micro HDMI★ | — |
| Hot Shoe | ✓ | ✓ |
Pros & Cons
Sony Alpha a6700 Black 2023
- Strong display (98th percentile)98th %ile
- Strong af (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong battery (97th percentile)97th %ile
- Strong connectivity (96th percentile)96th %ile
- Below average affordability (23rd percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (34th percentile)
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Silver
- Strong display (88th percentile)88th %ile
- Strong evf (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong af (81st percentile)81st %ile
- Strong social proof (78th percentile)
- Below average sensor (16th percentile)16th %ile
- Below average build (17th percentile)17th %ile
- Below average video (25th percentile)
- Below average user sentiment (34th percentile)
Pricing
Verdict
Scores 91 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 20 of 33 specs.
