Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II vs Minolta MND65
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Silver 2016
Olympus
80 Overall Score
vs
Minolta MND65 Black
Minolta
38 Overall Score
What Buyers Say
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Silver 2016
88 out of 100 medium confidence 28 reviews
The Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II is highly praised for its superb image stabilization, lightweight build, and excellent handling, making it a favorite for hiking and nature photography. Users appreciate its value, especially when compared to the Mark III, and note that it remains a capable camera despite its age. Some minor drawbacks include the lack of GPS, no pinch zoom on the touchscreen, and the need for firmware updates with older lenses.
Pros
- Excellent image stabilization
- Lightweight and compact
- Comfortable grip and handling
- Great value for money
- High-quality images
Cons
- No built-in GPS
- No pinch zoom on touchscreen
- Firmware updates needed for older lenses
- Screen protector may prevent flush closing
- No slow motion above 60fps
Image stabilization 5
Value for money 4
Build quality 3
Portability 3
Lens compatibility 3
Gps 2
Minolta MND65 Black
No customer feedback yet
Scores
Beginner
Sports Wildlife
Streaming
Wedding Events
Photography
Vlogging
Product Photography
Travel
Video
Youtube
Specifications
| Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | Minolta MND65 | |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor | ||
| Type | MOS | CMOS |
| Size | micro-four-thirds | 1/2.3-inch |
| Megapixels | 20.299999237060547 MP | 56 MP★ |
| ISO Range | 200 | 100★ |
| Processor | TruePic VIII | — |
| Autofocus | ||
| AF Points | ||
| AF Type | Contrast Detection: 121 (121 Cross-Type)Contrast Detection: 121 | — |
| Eye AF | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Animal AF | ✗ | — |
| Subject Detection | ✓★ | — |
| Shooting | ||
| Burst (Mechanical) | 15 fps★ | 6 fps |
| Burst (Electronic) | 60 fps★ | — |
| Max Shutter | 1/16000 | — |
| Electronic Shutter | ✓ | ✓ |
| Video | ||
| Max Resolution | 4K | 4K |
| 4K FPS | 30 fps | 60 fps★ |
| 1080p FPS | 120 fps | 120 fps |
| 10-bit | ✗ | — |
| Log Profile | ✗ | — |
| RAW Video | ✗ | — |
| Codec | H.264 | H.264 |
| Display & EVF | ||
| Screen Size | 3" | 3" |
| Touchscreen | ✓★ | ✗ |
| Articulating | ✓★ | ✗ |
| EVF Resolution | 2.4M dots★ | — |
| Build | ||
| Weather Sealed | ✓★ | — |
| Weight | 0.50 kg | 0.25 kg★ |
| Connectivity | ||
| Wi-Fi | ✓ | ✓ |
| Bluetooth | ✗ | ✗ |
| USB | USB-C (USB 2.0) | USB-C |
| HDMI | Micro-HDMI | — |
| Hot Shoe | ✓ | ✓ |
Pros & Cons
Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II Silver 2016
- Strong build (93rd percentile)93rd %ile
- Strong burst (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong connectivity (90th percentile)90th %ile
- Strong stabilization (89th percentile)89th %ile
Minolta MND65 Black
- Strong connectivity (82nd percentile)82nd %ile
- Strong stabilization (79th percentile)
- Strong video (77th percentile)
- Strong sensor (76th percentile)
- Below average af (1st percentile)1st %ile
- Below average social proof (7th percentile)7th %ile
- Below average build (9th percentile)9th %ile
- Below average display (30th percentile)
Pricing
Verdict
Winner: Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II
Scores 80 overall, wins 10 of 10 usage categories and 9 of 32 specs.
